His Honour Judge Simon Oliver works at the Upper Tribunal in London, Isleworth Crown Court and the family court in Reading and Slough County Courts.

This website deals with HHJ Simon Oliver asking for, accepting and taking bribes to pervert the course of justice. He is racist, corrupt and perverts the course of justice in return for illegal and criminal bribes in the UK court system.


Simon Oliver

This is a picture of His Honour Judge Simon Oliver. He is the one who takes bribes using the term ‘gift’. He is the criminal in the court system and eyewitness testimony exists to confirm this.


On June 24th, 2014, my team were sat in the Upper Tribunal located in the Breams Buildings in London for a case involving an unrepresented member of the public against the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS). The DBS has functions to bar people from working with children and vulnerable adults. 

At the oral hearing which lasted 4 days, HHJ Simon asked for a ‘gift’ from the parties concerned. The DBS gave him a gift in the form of a box which was wrapped up in a Sainsbury’s Carrier bag. Since then, HHJ Simon Oliver made a mockery out of the court system and the judgement he gave.





This is what took place throughout the 4 day hearing.


Incident in question

On day 1 of the oral hearing:

  • Within 5-10 minutes of the oral hearing initiating, HHJ Simon Oliver puts his hand over the microphone and says ‘Do you have anything for me?’. His head was down at this moment and we believe he was talking to the other side but no one specifically. The DBS barrister ‘BJ’ also putting his hand over the microphone (Only after HHJ Simon Oliver directed he do so) says ‘My client has a gift for you from The Trust’. Kevin Brooks from the Treasury Solicitors (TSOL) approaches the judicial bench with a box (the size of a book) in an orange Sainsbury’s carrier bag. HHJ Simon Oliver immediately puts his other hand up whilst his initial hand was still on the microphone and stops Kevin Brooks in his tracks. HHJ Simon Oliver directs his hand to his left to which Kevin Brooks puts his head down and follows to the end of the judicial bench. Mr Brooks tucks the box in neatly under or behind the bench or a table at the end of the bench away from sight although we could still see a piece of the carrier bag appearing from the area it was placed in. At this moment, a gasp appears in the courtroom about the incident and apparently the way Mr Brooks approached the judicial bench. Michael Flynn, a specialist panel whom also had his hand on the microphone during this period continued writing something whilst he clearly noticed the event. June Funnell, another specialist member laughed at the incident. Simon Oliver had an embarrassed smirk on his face as in ‘Have i been caught’. After this, BJ and HHJ Simon Oliver took their hands off the microphone. We are not sure if Michael Flynn or June Funnell had their hands on the microphone at this time as we were not observing them or their hands at this time.
  • The first day of the hearing was not bad. The judiciary seemed straight forward and impartial. Michael Flynn began doing some minor hand gestures towards the end of the day which we did not consider a major problem at the time. He did the hand gestures around 4-5 times (in guise that’s he’s not interested).
  • Towards the end of the hearing on the first day when the judiciary were retiring, HHJ Simon Oliver, June Funnell and Michael Flynn stood up to leave and were partly gone through the back door. June Funnell was the first one to leave through the back door and HHJ Simon Oliver was partly through the back door and Michael Flynn was in the process of going through the back door. That is when Kevin Brooks of the TSOL and an unknown member in the back of the court room uttered some words (unknown to what it was) and pointed out to the box under the judicial bench/table. To this, HHJ Simon Oliver said ‘Oh yeah’ and directed Michael Flynn pick up the box as Michael Flynn was the last one to leave through the back door. Michael Flynn picked up the box casually and put it with the rest of the items in his hand and left through the door. At this incident, there was a gasp in the back of the courtroom in shock. HHJ Simon Oliver in the meantime had a grin on his face pretending he didn’t know what he was doing. We are somewhat unsure if it was the same box that was placed in the morning as it was picked up quite quickly and Michael Flynns back was also turned towards us during this time. If we remember correctly, it was the same box although we could not physically describe the box that was picked up, only the one that was placed in that area that morning.


On day 2 of the oral hearing:

  • On the second day of the hearing, substantial number of hand gestures started off by HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn. Michael Flynn was more proficient in the hand gestures and he also made facial expressions and gasping noises throughout the day. HHJ Simon Oliver just did hand gestures.
  • The box in the carrier bag was no longer visible from where we were sitting and we believe the box was gone by this time and the box removed the day earlier was the same box that was no longer there.
  • By the end of the morning before lunch, we noticed Michael Flynn give an excess of 30 hand gestures in the form of a wave insinuating he is not interested in the appellants case and the defences. HHJ Simon Oliver did minor hand gestures, probably around 5-10 during this same period.
  • A witness called JR was being cross examined. During the cross examination, Michael Flynn puts his hand over the microphone and asked the appellant to change the question nearly 5-10 times. HHJ Simon Oliver agreed to this. Michael Flynn also continued his hand gestures to nearly another 40-50 in the afternoon. HHJ Simon Oliver also did the same at around 20 times.
  • Michael Flynn started doing facial expressions by moving his head away in a gesture that he is not interested or he is not listening. This happened nearly 30-40 times in the afternoon alone.
  • Michael Flynn started questioning JR about the job but that is as far as his specialist knowledge went. He was actually learning from the witnesses rather than agreeing or disagreeing with the specialist element. Michael Flynn also put his hand up during the appellants cross examination of JR stating he wants to listen to JR and not the appellant. Simon Oliver did the same in addition to Michael Flynn.
  • During the afternoon hearing. Michael Flynn threw his pen on the judicial bench several times, around 10 times in a gesture that he’s fed up of listening to the appellant speak. A comment was made at this time that ‘Your the type of person who should just be working at a petrol station’. This was by Michael Flynn, a racial slur. Due to the appellants unrepresented nature, they didn’t know how to respond. Michael Flynn also tried to put words in their mouth.
  • The appellant spoke in regards to a Gollywog matter where staff members at the former employer were carrying gollywogs and the management of the hospital took no action against the perpetrators. HHJ Simon Oliver said to this remark with his hand once again on the microphone ‘Gollywogs are not a racist, it was at once inappropriate’. Michael Flynn had a stern look on his face and nodded yes.
  • During JRs cross examination, HHJ Simon Oliver said to JR ‘Would you like his name on the internet if BJ upholds this case?’. JR responds by saying ‘Well, most hospitals are aware of him and to stay away from him’. HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn said ‘That’s good’. This was incredibly concerning as this was an actual request by the judge to one of the witnesses. We do not believe hands were on any microphones at this time so it may have been recorded although HHJ Simon Oliver kept his distance from the microphone quite a bit.
  • Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver puts their hands over the microphone about 3 times whilst they whispered to one another without any other party involved what they were discussing.


On day 3 of the oral hearing:

  • During the cross examination of GB, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver carried on their hand gestures. Michael Flynn may have carried out 50-60 hand gestures, 20 pen throws on his desk, 30 facial expressions and moving his head away and 2 whispers with Simon Oliver. Michael Flynns hands were once again on the microphone several times that we could not count the amount of times he did it. The same with HHJ Simon Oliver where he nodded his head around 5 times and waved his hand about 20 times.
  • When the appellant questioned GB about JRs statement ‘well, JR said in her statement that……..?’. The appellant was immediately interrupted by Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver saying ‘ no, no, no ,no ,no’ and tapping and banging their hands on the table. Michael Flynn once again nodding several times. HHJ Simon Oliver says ‘That’s now 5 times you have misquoted……’. In fact, the appellant did not misquote, it was an actual statement in JRs statement. The hand gestures were far greater on this day and nothing the appellant was saying was being heard.
  • Michael Flynn started an allegation about the appellant not being qualified and that the appellant lied to an agency they were working with. The appellant stated that a clinical specialist does not have to be qualified and they can practice with an equivalent and they did not lie to any agency or anyone for that matter. Michael Flynn stated ‘Your not qualified’ about 15 times and ‘Yes, you did lie’ about 10 times. The appellant said ‘well, the agency are specialists and they never said that’. Michael Flynn states ‘What, they are more specialist then me!’. The appellant said ‘I don’t know what your knowledge of the field is’. Michael Flynn states ‘Well, that should tell you then’ very rudely whilst still doing hand gestures and putting his hand over microphones. Michael Flynn then asks BJ and the TSOL to ask The Trust ‘Whether the appellant needs to be qualified’. Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver said to the appellant ‘Don’t worry, this isn’t going to form part of the judgement, we just want to know for ourselves, its all OK, don’t worry about it’. HHJ Simon Oliver said ‘Yes, don’t worry, its OK’. The response from the Trust came back that the appellant does not have to be qualified to practice so therefore the appellant was correct all along although the judgement does not report this and only reports the fabricated version.
  • When the appellant was being cross examined and was in the dock, HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn said ‘Move closer to the microphone, we want to capture all the content so there are not mistakes whilst their hands were on the microphone themselves.
  • Michael Flynn did 3 hand gestures during the appellants cross examination and nearly 20 time rolling his eyes and moving his face in annoyance from. HHJ Simon Oliver at this time sat back smirking and grinning behind his hand.


On day 4 of the oral hearing:

  • This day summing up was occurring. BJ spent over 30 minutes we believe on his summing up.
  • HHJ Simon Oliver said to BJ that the appellant was a ‘deserted rat’ to which Michael Flynn nodded his head
  • When the appellant was summing up their case, Michael Flynn was waving his hand again about 20-30 times as though he is not interested, HHJ Simon Oliver did it 3 times.
  • Michael Flynn shouted out at the appellant during summing up ‘What, you want to work in a hospital?’. The appellant said ‘Yes, i do and i didn’t harm any child or vulnerable adult’. To this response, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver responded ‘Well, that’s what we will consider’. Facial expressions and head movements were occurring during this comment.
  • The appellant put forward a case that their human rights have been breached and the procedure to bar was breached which is correct. Michael Flynn waved his hand at this remark. The appellant further mentioned the gollywog and HHJ Simon Oliver says ‘I already mentioned it yesterday, its not racist, it was made in to a big thing at one time’. This comment was made in a much lower voice away from his microphone.
  • Eventually 10 minutes in to the summing up, Michael Flynn and Simon Oliver once again were putting their hands over the microphones and whispering to one another. This occurred 3 times. Eventually HHJ Simon Oliver put his hand up in gesture of STOP! And thats enough of the appellants summing up when they had another 20 minutes of material to put forward which put forward errors of law and facts.
  • The last issue we remembered when the appellant was asking HHJ Simon Oliver how long will it be before they receive the judgement. He said with a smirk on his face that he will be going on holiday for 3 weeks and so the appellant will not receive the judgement under the end of July 2014. He also stated that he will be on a beach somewhere on a last minute holiday. To this remark, Michael Flynn, June Funnell, BJ and others in the back of the courtroom could be heard smirking and laughing. We believe this was HHJ Simon Oliver indirectly implying the contents of the box he retrieved on the first/second of the hearing contained monetary/holiday value and that he will be spending it on a luxury holiday on a beach.
  • The final moment was when the judiciary were leaving, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver with grins of their faces stood up and continued waving their hand at the appellant as though they are not interested for nearly 20 seconds before retiring.


Throughout the hearing, it was only June Funnell who acted professionally and listened to both sides but we believe she was looking towards HHJ Simon Oliver to understand what he was doing throughout. We think June Funnell has an approach that ’Its a mans world’ rather then act on anything she will observe is wrong. Although our complaint does not relate to her as we had confidence she behaved herself professionally throughout the majority of the hearing.

After observing the judgement, it was clear it was filled with lies, falsehood and deceit and clearly the appellant wasn’t heard. In fact, it would be sensible to say the appellant should not have turned up at the hearing. No safeguarding concerns were identified and no evidence supported the false allegations made against the appellant by the judiciary. The conduct of the judiciary shows they are/were severely biased as even a mere act of impropriety should not exist when handling cases when clearly with the substantial incidents addressed above shows this matter has gone beyond a mere act or a single incident. 

In 2015, the appellant asked the tribunal to reconsider the case under ‘errors of law’. The appellant received a somewhat concerning letter and response from HHJ Simon Oliver basically stating he will in future consider issuing a civil restraint order that i do not agree with his judgement when the appeal was on errors of law. Once again, HHJ Simon Oliver did not respond to the grounds of appeal under errors of law but rather ignored it just like he ignored it at the hearing and at the review of the decision. HHJ Simon Oliver was using his professional powers for personal gain by trying to push the appellant around once again. 

We were also somewhat surprised that HHJ Simon Oliver and other members of the courtroom and judiciary were making a mockery of the court system and communicating with hand gestures the majority of the time and placing hands on microphones throughout the hearing too.

Furthermore, the judiciary, mainly HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn should be suspended from their duties pending disciplinary action against them and also criminal charges placed upon them for:

  • Perverting the course of justice

  • Bribery under The Bribery Act 2010

  • Misconduct in a public office

  • Money laundering

  • Fraud

  • Misuse of public funds

  • Accessory to corrupting public morals

Consideration needs to also be given towards whether Kevin Brooks whom is the TSOL solicitor should also be prosecuted under the bribery act and for perverting the course of justice for giving a ‘gift’ to HHJ Simon Oliver.


Complaint made to the Upper Tribunal President.

A complaint was made to Justice Williams Charles of the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber about the issues raised. Initially Justice Williams Charles ignored all correspondence but after persistence from the appellant for over a year, he responded. He accepted the complaint and investigated it. After 6 weeks of investigating, the conclusion of Justice Williams Charles was:

  • The appellant was lying but does not support it with evidence. He claims the allegation in ‘incredible’
  • He refuses to investigate the matter of the gift box exchanging hands claiming the allegations is ‘Incredible’ and does not require further investigation.
  • He also claims in his letter that the recordings ‘cannot be retrieved’ on the ‘Dart Server’ and he has not got access to it. No reasons or investigation has been carried out or provided. We believe it has been deliberately deleted to cover up the bribe in question and the behaviour complained of.
  • The president of the Upper Tribunal claims the appellants ‘makes matter up’. No evidence is provided.

As of 2016, the matter is progressed to the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman awaiting an outcome but only on the procedure of the initial complaint.  A separate police investigation is also underway by the metropolitan police.


Police Investigation:

As of June 2016, HHJ Simon Oliver, Michael Flynn, Justice Williams Charles and TSOL Solicitor Kevin Brooks are being investigated by London police where prosecution is pending.


This web page has been created to warn the members of the public and the taxpayer that if you have HHJ Simon Oliver as a Judge, beware, HE TAKES BRIBES. What is even more concerning is his main speciality is the family division of Reading County Court and he has the potential to damage and destroy other peoples families because he wants bribes and gifts all the time. There is a reason why he places his hands on microphones all the time during the court hearings, it’s because he knows he is doing something wrong that he does not want recorded. The reason he does it is because his superiors are also doing it and encouraging him to do it as well. 

HHJ Simon Olivers address is:



HHJ Simon Olivers home

HHJ Simon Olivers home 2

This is the house that perverting the course of justice and taking bribes bought. It belongs to HHJ Simon Oliver. A true criminal in a robe. He keeps all the money from his bribes in his home until he can get his criminal friends to clean up the laundered money before putting it in to the bank. HHJ Simon Oliver does not represent a working judge. He was a spoilt rich kid being raised with a lavish lifestyle. Therefore, he has no sense of morals and resorts to taking bribes in the form of gift boxes because he knows his general work is not that good. 


Personal Life

Judge Simon claims he practices religion in his private life and seems to know a little about the religions practices although this is also a fraud considering he takes bribes in his professional life. He is lying to God and to everyone else around him about his faith as he does not practice what he preaches.

In 2016, his wife kicked him out of their family home because it came to light he was using male prostitutes and he was also involved in a gay relationship with another man. Although there is nothing wrong in being gay, it gives credence to the fact that Judge Simon Oliver is so dishonest in his personal life that he would lead his wife on for lengthy periods of time under falsehood and deceit. He lied to his wife, he cheated on her and he hid his sexuality from her too. We can only wonder what the poor lady went through. She should be commended for kicking him out of the family home. She should now expose him for the bribes he took throughout his judicial and legal career. He now lives in a flat nearby.

The address is:

Sindlesham Court, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire, England, RG41 5EA.

This premises is paid for by the taxpayers and the bribes and gifts he has received during the course of his career by lying, misrepresenting, colluding, cheating, stealing and fraud against innocent members of the public. It seems like lying, cheating and taking bribes has paid off for Simon Oliver.




If you have concerns about this judge or any other judge, please comment on the section provided below. Judges taking bribes are very common in the judicial system in the UK. Its called ‘The Gift System’. Its only when they get caught is when you see how the complaints process works which is a fraud itself. Judges even took bribes in the form of gift boxes in the Stephen Lawrence case but no one was held to account.

If you have any issues or problems in regards to the conduct of this judge, we advise you contact the police, obtain a crime report or crime reference number and leave it in the comments below so police complaints against this man can be recorded internationally.

Lets take one small step for the taxpayer and the hard-working member of the public and one giant leap to exposing HHJ Simon Oliver as a corrupt judge who is guilty of dishonesty. bribery and criminal activity.

Thank you for reading


      • Dear Ann,

        Thank you for your comment on my page. If simon oliver fabricated allegations against you to put your children in care, he has committed offences of perverting the course of justice and perjury. You should contact the police. The more police reports against this man, the more the chances of convicting him of judicial corruption. In London, he regularly and openly takes bribes in the upper tribunal to falsely claim and accuse innocent people of being paedophiles. He takes bribes using ‘gift boxes’.



    • Dear Anita,
      Can you please elaborate? We are trying to expose him and bring him to justice. We believe Simon Oliver has been taking bribes for a long time and he has been doing so in the family courts in Reading at the expense of destroying peoples lives and families.
      Any information or help will be appreciated.


      • Dear Ella, im sorry to hear about your problems with this criminal and corrupt judge simon oliver who takes bribes. We cannot give you legal advice but we would advise you to go to the police and the local council as well as the citizens advise bereau. You may also benefit to print out this website and use it in any court case which you deem fit to show Simon Oliver has been involved in perjury and criminal activity for a long time. The city of london police have received several reports on this judge in the past. He was investigated for perjury as a result of the Len Lawrence case.


    • Who would want to bum Oliver? There were rumours circulating that the reason he was removed as a vice president of the upper tribunal is because he was using rent boys. Unfortunately I have no remorse for his situation. He has been taking bribes and falsely accusing members of the public. I feel sorry for his victims. He is a criminal in a robe.


    • Lets put it this way, hes been taking bribes in the court system and fabricating judgments against innocent members of the public, then he goes home and lies to his wife and family about his sexuality. The least of my concerns are things getting too much for him. His behaviour is the cause of it! I say he deserves it and his victims should unite and be supported for the criminal activity they have been subjected to. Its seems like this judge and his lies are finally creeping up to him.


      • Hi,can you please contact me urgently. This judge was responsible for some ” unknown” strangers stealing my only Child from his school last week. I still have not seen or heard from my child and it’s a nightmare for me and my child. My child is in high risk of emotional abuse and negligence with strangers around him now.He was solely cared by his mother well,past 9 years of his life and there are plenty of supporting documents to prove the high standards of care the child had. My child was stolen from his school last week without his mother’s permission/ awareness, by using a fabricated and fraud document. I have never seen this judge in my life but his name was written on that document which was shown to cheat the child’s head teacher to steal my child. This abusive action was taken againt my vulnerable child with a false document produced out of an unlawful hearing “without both parties” presence in court for a final hearing ( for which court didn’t send any notice of hearing to parties)..! Eventually, I came to know father stole the child with illegal doings of his high paid solicitor by using this judge.Father lived mainly abroad past 9 years & has never “even once” been to child’s school past 4 years of child’s schooling.The child has also not seen or talked to the father past 3 years of divorce proceedings.Now after this child abusive incident by using a fraud document, I don’t think my child can be safe alone with his father or strangers around him, since the biggest & clear evidence is that father has not showed/ proved to a court his “parenting capacity” to keep a child with him. And father’s behaviours, alcoholism reactions etc is unknown to court . So no lawful or real court will put a child’s life in such possible harm especially by making him live without his mother’s care of past 9 years which child is used to- No matter what..! That document also says child’s mother is not allowed to visit child’s school..!!! Everyone found this extremely strange.! Because i am highly concerned about my child’s safety and wellbeing, I have put up my story in my face book so that this never happens again to any more innocent children and I can rescue my child.


      • Hi Mia,
        Thank you posting your concerns. This judge oliver is a bribe artist and has been regularly taking bribes to give false judgements. Your partners lawyer was not high priced as you probably think he was but his lawyer most probably gave judge oliver a ‘gift’ which is a bribe. They do this by placing boxes in court rooms with stocks, bonds, money, holidays, cruises etc but money is the most common. Judge oliver has given fabricated judgments for a minimum of £8000 in the past. He makes £4 million pounds using a bribery racket system. We advise you to report the matter to the police and add the crime reference report to this blog in the comments. You should also print this blog and take it to the police to show judge olivers pattern of criminal behaviour. No wonder judge olivers wife kicked him out.


      • Hi, thank you for the response. But I reported to the local police saying that my child is being kidnapped from his school by using a fraud court order which had this judge’s name in it. But looks like police is trying to cover up the wrong happenings as a part of corruption. Which other police should I complaint to ? I feel they are not even willing to file my complaints. My child’s life is in danger & police can’t take it seriously?!!. Please advise.


      • Hi
        We cannot give you legal advice as we are not a law firm. But if the police do not want to log complaints as they do not want it to form part of ‘unsolved crimes’ then you should contact the metropolitan police commissioner Mr Dyson naming this judge specifically as being involved in corrupt practices and the police refusing to investigate it. We have done the same recently too. You may also want to contact your local MP and contact 10 downing street. You should also write a complaint about this judge to the JCIO.


  1. I had this judge in my hearing at the Upper Tribunal. He dismissed the appeal because he received a box too from the respondent. I complained but the Upper Tribunal President covered it up. I now have no options left.


  2. Judges behaving badly? You want names? You don’t need NAMES! There isn’t an honest one among them. The are the Godfathers of Legal/Judicial Mafia, protection racketeers a million times worse than Al Capone.
    There are several pubs in England with the name ‘THE HONEST LAWYER’.
    the signs outside all show a lawyer with either his head cut off or his tongue cut out.
    Hitler said, “I won’t be satisfied until every German sees it as a disgrace to be a lawyer.”
    So, Adolf wasn’t wrong on EVERYTHING!


  3. This Judge Simon Oliver sentenced me to prison for 6 years at Isleworth Crown Court in London for a crime i did not commit. The prosecutor was gay and him and this judge had a thing going on in the hearing. Im sure they were involved in a relationship of some nature. Thank you for publishing this, this man is very crude.


  4. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver abuse of an extremely vulnerable adult: Leonard Lawrence SL03D00938
    The non disclosure by HHJ Simon Oliver of Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3’s in 2012/3/4/5/6
    HHJ Simon Oliver writes at point 27 on his Judgement dated 30 August 2012
    “H says that his counsel, at the hearing on 18th August 2005, says that the Official Solicitor did not agree the sale of the fmh at £622,000. However there is no evidence of this”.
    A recent search by HMCTS of HHJ Simon Oliver files at Reading County Court, found the evidence to be with HHJ Simon Oliver. It had been there since 2011 and not disclosed to the Court of Appeal and the Court of Protection by HHJ Simon Oliver in 2012 and 2013.
    “Particularly concerning”. was the failure Det Ch Supt Tim De Meyer, Head of Professional Standards, and Det Insp Gavin Tyrell, Head of Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police to investigate. Another Police Force have now identified offences of fraud and other more serious offence including perjury.

    Who ever sent me HHJ Simon Oliver’s emails a big thank you.

    Leonard Lawrence
    October 2016
    Anyone with information on Simon Oliver please contact me or post on this site.

    Following a phone call from HHJ Simon Oliver to my barrister, Dorian Day St Phillips Chambers Birmingham, my Mr Day withdrew from my case, even when Mrs Justice Pauffley had directed HHJ Simon Oliver to send my case to the Court of Appeal. and HHJ Phillip Waller directed the case be sent to the Court of Protection .

    I had a enlighten call from a former barrister from Tooks Chambers who has encountered HHJ Simon Oliver.


    • Thank you very much for this. Yes I know Simon Oliver very well. He is a serious bribe artist. His salary is in the region of £70-110k a year but his company brings in £4 million a year, I doubt all this is clean money. I have personally and physically caught this man taking bribes and his superior Justice William Charles whom is the President of the Upper Tribunal refused to investigate it and said the tape recordings of the hearing are no longer available. This is not only perjury and fraud but serious organised crime!


    • What was the reply from his encounter with oliver? Can you also add the crime reference number of your police report to this blog so it can all be matched up to the criminal it relates to. Thank you


  5. Simon Oliver was responsible for my 2 children being put into foster care. I later realised the company that was fostering them was owned by Judge oliver. I was not happy to say the least. I’m sure this is not a coincidence and this judge stole my kids off me and started making money from it. Unfortunately, most judges are doing this. I’m sure his activities are illegal but I can’t do anything about it. Death be to judge Simon Oliver. It will be nice to see him die a painful death, possibly from terminal cancer!


  6. Yes social workers are the same most have their own adoption companies check out companies house when challenged they change name of company . Judge Oliver took my granddaughter and placed her with a family that are well know drug dealers even on sex offenders register have been convicted for it all and served long prison sentences but him and social services think she is safe there what a joke they all need stringing up


    • Thats what bribe artists do. Simon Oliver should be investigated by the police and senior government officials under the 2001 Special Measures Act and Misconduct in a public office but all these criminals are putting their bank accounts first and getting away with it. They never admit they take bribes but its obvious they do, we have caught this man physically in court doing it. Hanging should be the punishment for those involved in such activities as these judges are working against the public and for themselves


  7. Dear All,
    this upcoming court case on Thursday 3rd Nov
    in Chester County Court , Chester, Cheshire UK
    is rather special.
    It has the ability to expose
    that the entirety of the authorities in Chester
    are ALL are evidenced
    by court documents,
    multicopy emails,
    media files ,
    official reports ….
    to have covered up , child rape,
    child sexual abuses,
    child batterings,
    child emotional abuses at torture levels,
    coercive control,
    false imprisonment,
    false arrests,
    malfeasance in public office,
    perverting the course of justice,
    abuse of process …and on and on ..
    These evil people are so arrogant
    and psychopathic
    that they have left trails
    of hard evidence
    heavily connecting all of this up.
    They have fully isolated and gagged my children,
    even forced to be home schooled
    in order to gag them.
    Placed with a paedophile
    who sexually approached and interfered with my daughter.
    Placed with a mother
    who the children were battered by and lived in fear of.
    Cheshire police simply refuse to investigate –
    because they and their freemason cronies are complicit.
    Now, another half wit judge (Pearce)
    is publicly witnessed and evidenced
    as pushing the evidence away
    saying it does not exit.
    He is publicly witnessed ,evidenced, recorded
    saying a penis forced into a child’s mouth
    is neither rape or a sexualised event ,
    and then saying to me and the public
    that ” it was only MY opinion ,
    ………..that evidence by police and professionals
    ………..stating a penis was forced into a child’s mouth
    ………..and genitalia to genitalia forced contact on the child
    ………..was neither rape, a sexualised event, or had been covered up”
    This vile sub hu man labled Pearce has obviously not read cps files on rape
    and he is willing to insanely state these things in public .
    No court in the land has jurisdiction to make insanity valid.
    He is publicly evidenced
    saying he can order people to see red books as yellow.
    This is the level of corruption they have gone to
    in order to cover up their corruption.
    …and historically they get away with it.
    The judiciary says this imbicile is above the law in his court.
    The judiciary says this man’s vile corruption
    MUST be fully open and accountable to the public ……
    we need you the public
    to witness this and report it ….widely ….
    ands is your legal civic duty.
    If you can attend,
    I have evidence for anyone to witness who wants it,
    if you cannot attend,
    I would appreciate your help to get THE TRUTH out everywhere
    in bringing these evil people to public account ,
    and remedy a huge contribution to the industrial scale institutional child abuse.


  8. I had Simon Oliver for my Upper Tribunal hearing and 3 months prior to the hearing taking place in a case management hearing, he asked me that he wants a gift of at least £6000 and that if I don’t have the money to pay him that I should carry out housing benefit fraud to generate the funds. I was incredibly surprised. He also asked me that he was very interested in stocks and bonds if I can give him some too.


    • Hi Sue, Yep its true. Apparently only the judges and lawyers are suppose to understand it because its their criminal racket system. This is why we need human rights. HHJ Simon Oliver openly took a bribe in open public court room on June 24th 2014 to dismiss the appeals. In fact he asked for the bribes.


  9. Well well well, looks like Judge Simon Olivers past is now finally catching up with him. This man has been ruining peoples lives and families and living the lifestyle from the bribes. This man is a true criminal. Only problem is that his superiors are the same and so is every judge in the land. We all have his address listed above, he hides it behind the trees, we should all go over there and take his belongings to refund our losses because he takes bribes. He has even asked NHS hospitals for holidays on beaches in return for fabricating judicial judgements so now hes stealing from other government funded bodies too at the risk of healthcare to patients. Please add all police reports and crime reference number in the comments so all police reports can be linked to this man nationally. And also widely distribute the site to everyone else as well, the campaign has had 200 shares on facebook so far. The more the better. All links are above to share this page.

    Thank you


  10. I was the barrister at a court hearing representing my client, a vulnerable adult. Judge oliver was the judge presiding the case. Judge oliver did a internet search on my clients address and stated that she has to give him 5% of the total value of her house to him as a gift. My client whom was renting the house did not get any sympathy or remorse from judge oliver who did not rule it in my clients favour. The matter is now going to europe under ECHR. This judge openly takes bribes and my client held me responsible for her losing money in legal fees. I was reported to the SRA for fraud when it was judge oliver who is the fraud. A corrupt judge to say the least. And yes all his judge friends and his superiors are involved in the same activities


  11. Judge Oliver came to my doctors surgery on the 15th August 2016. He reported in to reception openly stating he was there’ as part of the gift system’. I was somewhat amazed. I called my line manager over to ask her what he was going on about and she said that all i have to book him in as its the doctors orders. I was somewhat concerned he was openly stating he was there as part of a ‘gift system’ when judges have all along stated they never takes bribes. Dodgy man and a dodgy industry all these people are involved in.


    • wow now that is interesting ,

      I had a hearing around that time and he pulled some medical records out with similar name ,wrong dates and dob ,anything to damage someone’s reputations ,

      the records were of someone loosing or abort many children , when I only got 2 ,

      again a female judge who I recognized from previous criminal court in Westminster sat next to him whispered something and he had his hands over the micro ,all I heard is …..something something …comes with the gifts ,see how it goes ,

      he then looked over to my Young Barrister and somehow it looked like he flirted , he said to him we can leave it here less there is more to come ..perhaps ..looking amuse around …anyone.it was certainty a strange court hearing likewise to a circus , he is amused , and chuckled and everyone joined in ,

      Then he said to my Barrister can I see you in my chamber ,follow Hearing he did not turned up , and he held all fake names , dates against me even calling my child Princess is a wrong doing to him all his bizarre evidence be unfit in order to place child into care , I wish this crook be prosecuted soonest


  12. I need help on a judge called Justice Paufffley J, She sits in High court, and i have heard negative things about her from many many, people, back in 2015 there was a few people protesting outside the high court about a case she was doing a Satanic Cult Case which everybody believes she was covering up and looking out for these so called Pedophile and Baby Killers. Now, there’s nothing i can do regarding this because my lawyers fought hard to get my case appealed and, unfortunately she is the Judge who will be in task of making any findings and welfare decisions, i don’t have any hopes, but my Lawyer who’s just turned a QC, 6 months ago, tells me he will do his very best, but i know that if you leave it in the JUDGES hands it never goes your way, the Local Authority, have gone so far to even add more things they’re planning to seek against me, – why are family courts so corrupt?,

    if anybody has any news regarding this judge please let me know because everybody in the High court building told me very negative things about her


  13. Can somebody explain this whole corruption and bribe thing? Like at the end of the day. These judges have to go by the law and in their judgement they will come to their conclusion based on the law alone?,

    So how does this whole “gift” business happen in the court? I want to know whether these judges who write 100 page long judgement make crap up for just a gift?

    Lets just say, their was true allegations of sexual abuse, but the respondent party lawyer gave a gift to the judge and then for that, the judge gave back a judgement in his favour?

    Please answer my question back and hopefully if this is what is happening im truly in to STOP THIS INJUSTICE


    • Hi Frankie, yes it is true. The same system was in operation in the Stephen Lawrence case and it took the family 21 years to get justice. This probably doesnt happen where big companies or governments are involved, its more to do with everyday members of the public. A judge is not going to take a bribe if he heard a court case where the parties were bodies or organisations, he will only do it when a party is either unrepresented or when no one is looking. Judges like these ‘gifts’ but they dont always ask for it. The box is usually left in the court room in the eye of the judge. So lets says someone was accused of genuine child abuse and that party hired a ‘high priced lawyer’. His lawyer will say to him (some lawyers) that he is entitled to give a judge a ‘gift’. The ‘gift’ is placed in a box and left in the courtroom. The higher the value of this ‘gift’, the better and more favourable the judgement. Although very few judges take these ‘gifts’ and still come to the correct decision but in that way the party that bribed the judge will make sure (through their lawyers) never to give this judge a ‘gift’ again so the judge doesnt really make much money. A judge will lie in all their judgements. have you wondered why many people complain all the time about it as they obviously do not agree with it but most of these people are poor and have no money and cannot fight it as the case just goes to another judge whose also doing the same. When it comes to interpreting the law, yes you are correct but judges dont have to interpret the law, they just twist it and make any excuse not to accept your appeals. The court of appeal dismisses 99% of appeals unless it comes from a lawyer they are friends with. Therefore we need European courts whom rule in 80% of cases for us, the public!! This is why judges and governments do not like human rights laws and are doing anything to get rid of it as the government is ultimately paying out compensations to the public for false charges being placed on them. Lets look at it like this, if you took someone to court, have you got confidence you will win even though you are 100% right? no you dont because the judge will not do anything for you unless they do not get a ‘gift’. These judges and lawyers love placing false charges on members of the public because then they come to court and have to finance legal funding to defend themselves and even after that many appeal channels exist. The government has even got rid of legal aid because judges and lawyers were using it for their own criminal racket system making billions by falsely accusing members of the public of all sorts. A paedophile could technically get let off if the judge liked their ‘gift’. Have you wondered why they are so many appeal courts, because they dont trust each other. Judges have always taken bribes, we have physically seen Judge Simon Oliver do it but his superiors covered it up so thats why this webpage has been created to inform the public of this criminal acts. just read the comments above about this one judges activities and need i say more.


      • Ok let me get this straight,
        If this is true, how is this Judge even still employed as a Judge?

        Please can you tell me if you think Justice pauffley is a fair judge?

        Can Local authority, pay the judge to have the judgement in their favor too?

        In particular, Maidenhead Berkshire, my children were taken away as she made welfare decisions that they stay in long term care.

        I know justice pauffley is a senior judge been sitting at high court since 03′ but she could not decline a gift regardless of if she gets 100k a year or more.

        Please get back to me


      • Unfortunately it is true that high court judges also take gifts. I know senior high court judges take them and send people to prison for it without any accountability to anyone. Local authorities also give judges ‘gifts’ but only if they know they will lose and they will be named and shamed. All judges are taking ‘gifts’, they are not even ‘gifts’ but bribes just under a different header. Its a complete fraud system. The reason these judges are employed is because all of them are doing it and to prove something like that you need to prove it to the criminal standard and keep in mind no cameras in the court room and they place hands of microphones too.


      • The buden of proof is much lower in civil matters, even if that’s true doesn’t mean a Judge should find “A” responsible for sexually abusing “B” when there’s only video evidence and the complaints story alone. Any judge shouldn’t go far beyond the standard of proof in civil matters and say, im 100% certain that “A” abused “B” based on the whole evidence E.G video evidence. I truly believe only a criminal court should deal with those matters because their standard of proof is much higher.

        How some high court judges come to their conclusion based on video evidence as in ABE police interview alone without no live evidence from a witness is beyond my mind.

        I respect criminal judges more than family judges.


      • You are right, a criminal court is a better place but only because there is a jury to answer to. Its the jury that should be respected, not the judge. The judge still messes around everywhere. And most importantly family judges sit in criminal courts too and behave completely differently, thats because they know how the civil system works and that is that its riddled with a bribery system called ‘gifts’. A jury case complies with article 6 of the ECHR which is a right to a fair trial especially when it involves prison.


      • In my experience in criminal law, my friend was being tried for sexaully assault. But long story short CPS didn’t build up their case to the point where the judge ends up telling the jury to acquit.

        Now tell me where in a civil matter has a Judge ever gone beyond his/her powers to protect a inocent man’s name?
        Only when or if he’s rich does that happen. And when there’s good lawyers involved like QC”s

        I just think the family courts are only there to give local authorities what they want.

        Unless you can explain to me what a family court is for i will always believe its there for only 1 purpose no wonder why its not open to the public yet tax payers pay for those courts to run.!


  14. Speakers:David Wolfe, Douglas Silas, Principal, His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Judge Meleri Tudur, Judge Jane McConnell, Julie MoktadireLocation:Copthorne Tara Hotel, Kensington, LONDON , W8 5SR (GPS W8 5SY)Date: 07 March 2017 09:00 – 07 March 2017 17:00

    Let’s go and expose him for real guys 2017!


  15. So, their Judgements arent based on the law, but it’s based on their personal opinion.// i was acquitted in the criminal courts, but the family courts in the high court// and the judge Pauffley J, didn’t even look at the critical evidence// – My lawyers told me that i cant appeal the senior judges judgement, even if i have grounds of appeal. because she’s a top judge, you cannot appeal the court of appeals decsion either so that’s just so upsetting.// i believe in JUSTICE.but in this court of law. NO if you have money then you can definetly buy justice. but for the poor, no.


    • That is true. Judges know people will foot money to clear their name and if they don’t, the judge will make it worse. Its a criminal racket system. The criminal courts are trialled by jury whom are reasonable but the judge is the one messing around with the lawyers. You can appeal to the ECHR under article 6 which is a right to a fair trial. The european courts do not take bribes like the british judges do and are very pro human rights!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s