HHJ SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT

 

-PART OF THE REAL OPERATION ‘BLACKBRIAR’-

 

HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER 

INTRODUCING A CRIMINAL IN A ROBE

 

court-generic_650x488_51439796881 

 

Welcome to this blog which is part of the The Real Operation ‘Blackbriar’. If you have reached here, it must be because a Judge or a lawyer has been up to no good. Well, look no further because we are here to help. Operation ‘Blackbriar’ is here to help the public against bribery and corruption in the British Judicial system. This blog represents the truth against publicly funded criminals and exposes the criminals that operate in our judicial offices.

 

His Honour Judge Simon Oliver works at the Upper Tribunal in London, Isleworth Crown Court and the family court in Reading and Slough County Courts.

This website deals with HHJ Simon Oliver asking for, accepting and taking bribes to pervert the course of justice. He is racist, very corrupt, perverts the course of justice and commits perjury in return for illegal and criminal bribes in the UK court system.

 

Simon Oliver

This is a picture of His Honour Judge Simon Oliver. He is the one who takes bribes using the term ‘gift’. He is the criminal in the court system and eyewitness testimony exists to confirm this.

 

On June 24th, 2014, my team were sat in the Upper Tribunal located in the Breams Buildings in London for a case involving an unrepresented member of the public against the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS). The DBS has functions to bar people from working with children and vulnerable adults. 

At the oral hearing which lasted 4 days, HHJ Simon asked for a ‘gift’ from the parties concerned. The DBS gave him a gift in the form of a box which was wrapped up in a Sainsbury’s Carrier bag. Since then, HHJ Simon Oliver made a mockery out of the court system and the judgement he gave.

IF YOU HAVE THIS JUDGE IN YOUR CASE, PLEASE NOTE, HE TAKES BRIBES IN THE FORM OF ‘GIFT BOXES’.

IF THE JUDGEMENT YOU RECEIVED IS FILLED WITH LIES, ITS BECAUSE HHJ SIMON OLIVER HAS RECEIVED A GIFT THROUGH OTHER MEANS.

IF HE GIVES YOU A CORRUPT JUDGEMENT AND PENALTY, APPEAL IT AS ITS MOST LIKELY HE HAS RECEIVED ‘GIFTS’.

BY NOTE, PLEASE BE MINDED, A GIFT IS AN ALTERNATIVE WORD FOR A BRIBE AND INVOLVES MONEY, HOLIDAYS, CRUISES AND JUST ABOUT ANYTHING OF VALUE. HOWEVER, MONEY IS THE MOST COMMON.

This is what took place throughout the 4 day hearing.

 

Incident in question

On day 1 of the oral hearing:

  • Within 5-10 minutes of the oral hearing initiating, HHJ Simon Oliver puts his hand over the microphone and says ‘Do you have anything for me?’. His head was down at this moment and we believe he was talking to the other side but no one specifically. The DBS barrister ‘BJ’ also putting his hand over the microphone (Only after HHJ Simon Oliver directed he do so) says ‘My client has a gift for you from The Trust’. Kevin Brooks from the Treasury Solicitors (TSOL) approaches the judicial bench with a box (the size of a book) in an orange Sainsbury’s carrier bag. HHJ Simon Oliver immediately puts his other hand up whilst his initial hand was still on the microphone and stops Kevin Brooks in his tracks. HHJ Simon Oliver directs his hand to his left to which Kevin Brooks puts his head down and follows to the end of the judicial bench. Mr Brooks tucks the box in neatly under or behind the bench or a table at the end of the bench away from sight although we could still see a piece of the carrier bag appearing from the area it was placed in. At this moment, a gasp appears in the courtroom about the incident and apparently the way Mr Brooks approached the judicial bench. Michael Flynn, a specialist panel whom also had his hand on the microphone during this period continued writing something whilst he clearly noticed the event. June Funnell, another specialist member laughed at the incident. Simon Oliver had an embarrassed smirk on his face as in ‘Have i been caught’. After this, BJ and HHJ Simon Oliver took their hands off the microphone. We are not sure if Michael Flynn or June Funnell had their hands on the microphone at this time as we were not observing them or their hands at this time.
  • The first day of the hearing was not bad. The judiciary seemed straight forward and impartial. Michael Flynn began doing some minor hand gestures towards the end of the day which we did not consider a major problem at the time. He did the hand gestures around 4-5 times (in guise that’s he’s not interested).
  • Towards the end of the hearing on the first day when the judiciary were retiring, HHJ Simon Oliver, June Funnell and Michael Flynn stood up to leave and were partly gone through the back door. June Funnell was the first one to leave through the back door and HHJ Simon Oliver was partly through the back door and Michael Flynn was in the process of going through the back door. That is when Kevin Brooks of the TSOL and an unknown member in the back of the court room uttered some words (unknown to what it was) and pointed out to the box under the judicial bench/table. To this, HHJ Simon Oliver said ‘Oh yeah’ and directed Michael Flynn pick up the box as Michael Flynn was the last one to leave through the back door. Michael Flynn picked up the box casually and put it with the rest of the items in his hand and left through the door. At this incident, there was a gasp in the back of the courtroom in shock. HHJ Simon Oliver in the meantime had a grin on his face pretending he didn’t know what he was doing. We are somewhat unsure if it was the same box that was placed in the morning as it was picked up quite quickly and Michael Flynns back was also turned towards us during this time. If we remember correctly, it was the same box although we could not physically describe the box that was picked up, only the one that was placed in that area that morning.

 

On day 2 of the oral hearing:

  • On the second day of the hearing, substantial number of hand gestures started off by HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn. Michael Flynn was more proficient in the hand gestures and he also made facial expressions and gasping noises throughout the day. HHJ Simon Oliver just did hand gestures.
  • The box in the carrier bag was no longer visible from where we were sitting and we believe the box was gone by this time and the box removed the day earlier was the same box that was no longer there.
  • By the end of the morning before lunch, we noticed Michael Flynn give an excess of 30 hand gestures in the form of a wave insinuating he is not interested in the appellants case and the defences. HHJ Simon Oliver did minor hand gestures, probably around 5-10 during this same period.
  • A witness called JR was being cross examined. During the cross examination, Michael Flynn puts his hand over the microphone and asked the appellant to change the question nearly 5-10 times. HHJ Simon Oliver agreed to this. Michael Flynn also continued his hand gestures to nearly another 40-50 in the afternoon. HHJ Simon Oliver also did the same at around 20 times.
  • Michael Flynn started doing facial expressions by moving his head away in a gesture that he is not interested or he is not listening. This happened nearly 30-40 times in the afternoon alone.
  • Michael Flynn started questioning JR about the job but that is as far as his specialist knowledge went. He was actually learning from the witnesses rather than agreeing or disagreeing with the specialist element. Michael Flynn also put his hand up during the appellants cross examination of JR stating he wants to listen to JR and not the appellant. Simon Oliver did the same in addition to Michael Flynn.
  • During the afternoon hearing. Michael Flynn threw his pen on the judicial bench several times, around 10 times in a gesture that he’s fed up of listening to the appellant speak. A comment was made at this time that ‘Your the type of person who should just be working at a petrol station’. This was by Michael Flynn, a racial slur. Due to the appellants unrepresented nature, they didn’t know how to respond. Michael Flynn also tried to put words in their mouth.
  • The appellant spoke in regards to a Gollywog matter where staff members at the former employer were carrying gollywogs and the management of the hospital took no action against the perpetrators. HHJ Simon Oliver said to this remark with his hand once again on the microphone ‘Gollywogs are not a racist, it was at once inappropriate’. Michael Flynn had a stern look on his face and nodded yes.
  • During JRs cross examination, HHJ Simon Oliver said to JR ‘Would you like his name on the internet if BJ upholds this case?’. JR responds by saying ‘Well, most hospitals are aware of him and to stay away from him’. HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn said ‘That’s good’. This was incredibly concerning as this was an actual request by the judge to one of the witnesses. We do not believe hands were on any microphones at this time so it may have been recorded although HHJ Simon Oliver kept his distance from the microphone quite a bit.
  • Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver puts their hands over the microphone about 3 times whilst they whispered to one another without any other party involved what they were discussing.

 

On day 3 of the oral hearing:

  • During the cross examination of GB, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver carried on their hand gestures. Michael Flynn may have carried out 50-60 hand gestures, 20 pen throws on his desk, 30 facial expressions and moving his head away and 2 whispers with Simon Oliver. Michael Flynns hands were once again on the microphone several times that we could not count the amount of times he did it. The same with HHJ Simon Oliver where he nodded his head around 5 times and waved his hand about 20 times.
  • When the appellant questioned GB about JRs statement ‘well, JR said in her statement that……..?’. The appellant was immediately interrupted by Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver saying ‘ no, no, no ,no ,no’ and tapping and banging their hands on the table. Michael Flynn once again nodding several times. HHJ Simon Oliver says ‘That’s now 5 times you have misquoted……’. In fact, the appellant did not misquote, it was an actual statement in JRs statement. The hand gestures were far greater on this day and nothing the appellant was saying was being heard.
  • Michael Flynn started an allegation about the appellant not being qualified and that the appellant lied to an agency they were working with. The appellant stated that a clinical specialist does not have to be qualified and they can practice with an equivalent and they did not lie to any agency or anyone for that matter. Michael Flynn stated ‘Your not qualified’ about 15 times and ‘Yes, you did lie’ about 10 times. The appellant said ‘well, the agency are specialists and they never said that’. Michael Flynn states ‘What, they are more specialist then me!’. The appellant said ‘I don’t know what your knowledge of the field is’. Michael Flynn states ‘Well, that should tell you then’ very rudely whilst still doing hand gestures and putting his hand over microphones. Michael Flynn then asks BJ and the TSOL to ask The Trust ‘Whether the appellant needs to be qualified’. Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver said to the appellant ‘Don’t worry, this isn’t going to form part of the judgement, we just want to know for ourselves, its all OK, don’t worry about it’. HHJ Simon Oliver said ‘Yes, don’t worry, its OK’. The response from the Trust came back that the appellant does not have to be qualified to practice so therefore the appellant was correct all along although the judgement does not report this and only reports the fabricated version.
  • When the appellant was being cross examined and was in the dock, HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn said ‘Move closer to the microphone, we want to capture all the content so there are not mistakes whilst their hands were on the microphone themselves.
  • Michael Flynn did 3 hand gestures during the appellants cross examination and nearly 20 time rolling his eyes and moving his face in annoyance from. HHJ Simon Oliver at this time sat back smirking and grinning behind his hand.

 

On day 4 of the oral hearing:

  • This day summing up was occurring. BJ spent over 30 minutes we believe on his summing up.
  • HHJ Simon Oliver said to BJ that the appellant was a ‘deserted rat’ to which Michael Flynn nodded his head
  • When the appellant was summing up their case, Michael Flynn was waving his hand again about 20-30 times as though he is not interested, HHJ Simon Oliver did it 3 times.
  • Michael Flynn shouted out at the appellant during summing up ‘What, you want to work in a hospital?’. The appellant said ‘Yes, i do and i didn’t harm any child or vulnerable adult’. To this response, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver responded ‘Well, that’s what we will consider’. Facial expressions and head movements were occurring during this comment.
  • The appellant put forward a case that their human rights have been breached and the procedure to bar was breached which is correct. Michael Flynn waved his hand at this remark. The appellant further mentioned the gollywog and HHJ Simon Oliver says ‘I already mentioned it yesterday, its not racist, it was made in to a big thing at one time’. This comment was made in a much lower voice away from his microphone.
  • Eventually 10 minutes in to the summing up, Michael Flynn and Simon Oliver once again were putting their hands over the microphones and whispering to one another. This occurred 3 times. Eventually HHJ Simon Oliver put his hand up in gesture of STOP! And thats enough of the appellants summing up when they had another 20 minutes of material to put forward which put forward errors of law and facts.
  • The last issue we remembered when the appellant was asking HHJ Simon Oliver how long will it be before they receive the judgement. He said with a smirk on his face that he will be going on holiday for 3 weeks and so the appellant will not receive the judgement under the end of July 2014. He also stated that he will be on a beach somewhere on a last minute holiday. To this remark, Michael Flynn, June Funnell, BJ and others in the back of the courtroom could be heard smirking and laughing. We believe this was HHJ Simon Oliver indirectly implying the contents of the box he retrieved on the first/second of the hearing contained monetary/holiday value and that he will be spending it on a luxury holiday on a beach.
  • The final moment was when the judiciary were leaving, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver with grins of their faces stood up and continued waving their hand at the appellant as though they are not interested for nearly 20 seconds before retiring.

 

Throughout the hearing, it was only June Funnell who acted professionally and listened to both sides but we believe she was looking towards HHJ Simon Oliver to understand what he was doing throughout. We think June Funnell has an approach that ’Its a mans world’ rather then act on anything she will observe is wrong. Although our complaint does not relate to her as we had confidence she behaved herself professionally throughout the majority of the hearing.

After observing the judgement, it was clear it was filled with lies, falsehood and deceit and clearly the appellant wasn’t heard. In fact, it would be sensible to say the appellant should not have turned up at the hearing. No safeguarding concerns were identified and no evidence supported the false allegations made against the appellant by the judiciary. The conduct of the judiciary shows they are/were severely biased as even a mere act of impropriety should not exist when handling cases when clearly with the substantial incidents addressed above shows this matter has gone beyond a mere act or a single incident. 

In 2015, the appellant asked the tribunal to reconsider the case under ‘errors of law’. The appellant received a somewhat concerning letter and response from HHJ Simon Oliver basically stating he will in future consider issuing a civil restraint order that i do not agree with his judgement when the appeal was on errors of law. Once again, HHJ Simon Oliver did not respond to the grounds of appeal under errors of law but rather ignored it just like he ignored it at the hearing and at the review of the decision. HHJ Simon Oliver was using his professional powers for personal gain by trying to push the appellant around once again. 

We were also somewhat surprised that HHJ Simon Oliver and other members of the courtroom and judiciary were making a mockery of the court system and communicating with hand gestures the majority of the time and placing hands on microphones throughout the hearing too.

Furthermore, the judiciary, mainly HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn should be suspended from their duties pending disciplinary action against them and also criminal charges placed upon them for:

  • Perverting the course of justice

  • Bribery under The Bribery Act 2010

  • Misconduct in a public office

  • Money laundering

  • Fraud

  • Misuse of public funds

  • Accessory to corrupting public morals

Consideration needs to also be given towards whether Kevin Brooks whom is the TSOL solicitor should also be prosecuted under the bribery act and for perverting the course of justice for giving a ‘gift’ to HHJ Simon Oliver.

 

Complaint made to the Upper Tribunal President.

A complaint was made to Justice Williams Charles of the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber about the issues raised. Initially Justice Williams Charles ignored all correspondence but after persistence from the appellant for over a year, he responded. He accepted the complaint and investigated it. After 6 weeks of investigating, the conclusion of Justice Williams Charles was:

  • The appellant was lying but does not support it with evidence. He claims the allegation in ‘incredible’
  • He refuses to investigate the matter of the gift box exchanging hands claiming the allegations is ‘Incredible’ and does not require further investigation.
  • He also claims in his letter that the recordings ‘cannot be retrieved’ on the ‘Dart Server’ and he has not got access to it. No reasons or investigation has been carried out or provided. We believe it has been deliberately deleted to cover up the bribe in question and the behaviour complained of.
  • The president of the Upper Tribunal claims the appellants ‘makes matter up’. No evidence is provided.

As of 2016, the matter is progressed to the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman awaiting an outcome but only on the procedure of the initial complaint.  A separate police investigation is also underway by the metropolitan police.

 

Police Investigation:

As of June 2016, HHJ Simon Oliver, Michael Flynn, Justice Williams Charles and TSOL Solicitor Kevin Brooks are being investigated by London police where prosecution is pending.

 

This web page has been created to warn the members of the public and the taxpayer that if you have HHJ Simon Oliver as a Judge, beware, HE TAKES BRIBES. What is even more concerning is his main speciality is the family division of Reading County Court and he has the potential to damage and destroy other peoples families because he wants bribes and gifts all the time. There is a reason why he places his hands on microphones all the time during the court hearings, it’s because he knows he is doing something wrong that he does not want recorded. The reason he does it is because his superiors are also doing it and encouraging him to do it as well. 

HHJ Simon Olivers address is:

‘GLENWOOD’, 20 LOWTHER ROAD, WOKINGHAM, BERKSHIRE, RG41 1JD.

 

HHJ Simon Olivers home

HHJ Simon Olivers home 2

This is the house that perverting the course of justice and taking bribes bought. It belongs to HHJ Simon Oliver. A true criminal in a robe. He keeps all the money from his bribes in his home until he can get his criminal friends to clean up the laundered money before putting it in to the bank. HHJ Simon Oliver does not represent a working judge. He was a spoilt rich kid being raised with a lavish lifestyle. Therefore, he has no sense of morals and resorts to taking bribes in the form of gift boxes because he knows his general work is not that good. 

 

Personal Life

Judge Simon claims he practices religion in his private life and seems to know a little about the religions practices although this is also a fraud considering he takes bribes in his professional life. He is lying to God and to everyone else around him about his faith as he does not practice what he preaches.

In 2016, his wife kicked him out of their family home because it came to light he was using male prostitutes and he was also involved in a gay relationship with another man. Although there is nothing wrong in being gay, it gives credence to the fact that Judge Simon Oliver is so dishonest in his personal life that he would lead his wife on for lengthy periods of time under falsehood and deceit. He lied to his wife, he cheated on her and he hid his sexuality from her too. We can only wonder what the poor lady went through. She should be commended for kicking him out of the family home. She should now expose him for the bribes he took throughout his judicial and legal career. He now lives in a flat nearby.

The address is:

Sindlesham Court, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire, England, RG41 5EA.

This premises is paid for by the taxpayers and the bribes and gifts he has received during the course of his career by lying, misrepresenting, colluding, cheating, stealing and fraud against innocent members of the public. It seems like lying, cheating and taking bribes has paid off for Simon Oliver.

 

simon-oliver-judge-2simon-oliver-judge-3imgf7263

 

If you have concerns about this judge or any other judge, please comment on the section provided below. Judges taking bribes are very common in the judicial system in the UK. Its called ‘The Gift System’. Its only when they get caught is when you see how the complaints process works which is a fraud itself. Judges even took bribes in the form of gift boxes in the Stephen Lawrence case but no one was held to account.

If you have any issues or problems in regards to the conduct of this judge, we advise you contact the police, obtain a crime report or crime reference number and leave it in the comments below so police complaints against this man can be recorded internationally.

Lets take one small step for the taxpayer and the hard-working member of the public and one giant leap to exposing HHJ Simon Oliver as a corrupt judge who is guilty of dishonesty. bribery and criminal activity.

Thank you for reading

235 thoughts on “HHJ SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT

      • Dear Ann,

        Thank you for your comment on my page. If simon oliver fabricated allegations against you to put your children in care, he has committed offences of perverting the course of justice and perjury. You should contact the police. The more police reports against this man, the more the chances of convicting him of judicial corruption. In London, he regularly and openly takes bribes in the upper tribunal to falsely claim and accuse innocent people of being paedophiles. He takes bribes using ‘gift boxes’.

        Regards

        Like

    • Dear Anita,
      Can you please elaborate? We are trying to expose him and bring him to justice. We believe Simon Oliver has been taking bribes for a long time and he has been doing so in the family courts in Reading at the expense of destroying peoples lives and families.
      Any information or help will be appreciated.
      Regards

      Like

      • Dear Ella, im sorry to hear about your problems with this criminal and corrupt judge simon oliver who takes bribes. We cannot give you legal advice but we would advise you to go to the police and the local council as well as the citizens advise bereau. You may also benefit to print out this website and use it in any court case which you deem fit to show Simon Oliver has been involved in perjury and criminal activity for a long time. The city of london police have received several reports on this judge in the past. He was investigated for perjury as a result of the Len Lawrence case.

        Like

    • Who would want to bum Oliver? There were rumours circulating that the reason he was removed as a vice president of the upper tribunal is because he was using rent boys. Unfortunately I have no remorse for his situation. He has been taking bribes and falsely accusing members of the public. I feel sorry for his victims. He is a criminal in a robe.

      Like

    • Lets put it this way, hes been taking bribes in the court system and fabricating judgments against innocent members of the public, then he goes home and lies to his wife and family about his sexuality. The least of my concerns are things getting too much for him. His behaviour is the cause of it! I say he deserves it and his victims should unite and be supported for the criminal activity they have been subjected to. Its seems like this judge and his lies are finally creeping up to him.

      Like

      • Hi,can you please contact me urgently. This judge was responsible for some ” unknown” strangers stealing my only Child from his school last week. I still have not seen or heard from my child and it’s a nightmare for me and my child. My child is in high risk of emotional abuse and negligence with strangers around him now.He was solely cared by his mother well,past 9 years of his life and there are plenty of supporting documents to prove the high standards of care the child had. My child was stolen from his school last week without his mother’s permission/ awareness, by using a fabricated and fraud document. I have never seen this judge in my life but his name was written on that document which was shown to cheat the child’s head teacher to steal my child. This abusive action was taken againt my vulnerable child with a false document produced out of an unlawful hearing “without both parties” presence in court for a final hearing ( for which court didn’t send any notice of hearing to parties)..! Eventually, I came to know father stole the child with illegal doings of his high paid solicitor by using this judge.Father lived mainly abroad past 9 years & has never “even once” been to child’s school past 4 years of child’s schooling.The child has also not seen or talked to the father past 3 years of divorce proceedings.Now after this child abusive incident by using a fraud document, I don’t think my child can be safe alone with his father or strangers around him, since the biggest & clear evidence is that father has not showed/ proved to a court his “parenting capacity” to keep a child with him. And father’s behaviours, alcoholism reactions etc is unknown to court . So no lawful or real court will put a child’s life in such possible harm especially by making him live without his mother’s care of past 9 years which child is used to- No matter what..! That document also says child’s mother is not allowed to visit child’s school..!!! Everyone found this extremely strange.! Because i am highly concerned about my child’s safety and wellbeing, I have put up my story in my face book so that this never happens again to any more innocent children and I can rescue my child.

        Like

      • Hi Mia,
        Thank you posting your concerns. This judge oliver is a bribe artist and has been regularly taking bribes to give false judgements. Your partners lawyer was not high priced as you probably think he was but his lawyer most probably gave judge oliver a ‘gift’ which is a bribe. They do this by placing boxes in court rooms with stocks, bonds, money, holidays, cruises etc but money is the most common. Judge oliver has given fabricated judgments for a minimum of £8000 in the past. He makes £4 million pounds using a bribery racket system. We advise you to report the matter to the police and add the crime reference report to this blog in the comments. You should also print this blog and take it to the police to show judge olivers pattern of criminal behaviour. No wonder judge olivers wife kicked him out.

        Like

      • Hi, thank you for the response. But I reported to the local police saying that my child is being kidnapped from his school by using a fraud court order which had this judge’s name in it. But looks like police is trying to cover up the wrong happenings as a part of corruption. Which other police should I complaint to ? I feel they are not even willing to file my complaints. My child’s life is in danger & police can’t take it seriously?!!. Please advise.

        Like

      • Hi
        We cannot give you legal advice as we are not a law firm. But if the police do not want to log complaints as they do not want it to form part of ‘unsolved crimes’ then you should contact the metropolitan police commissioner Mr Dyson naming this judge specifically as being involved in corrupt practices and the police refusing to investigate it. We have done the same recently too. You may also want to contact your local MP and contact 10 downing street. You should also write a complaint about this judge to the JCIO.

        Like

  1. I had this judge in my hearing at the Upper Tribunal. He dismissed the appeal because he received a box too from the respondent. I complained but the Upper Tribunal President covered it up. I now have no options left.

    Like

  2. Judges behaving badly? You want names? You don’t need NAMES! There isn’t an honest one among them. The are the Godfathers of Legal/Judicial Mafia, protection racketeers a million times worse than Al Capone.
    There are several pubs in England with the name ‘THE HONEST LAWYER’.
    the signs outside all show a lawyer with either his head cut off or his tongue cut out.
    Hitler said, “I won’t be satisfied until every German sees it as a disgrace to be a lawyer.”
    So, Adolf wasn’t wrong on EVERYTHING!

    Like

  3. This Judge Simon Oliver sentenced me to prison for 6 years at Isleworth Crown Court in London for a crime i did not commit. The prosecutor was gay and him and this judge had a thing going on in the hearing. Im sure they were involved in a relationship of some nature. Thank you for publishing this, this man is very crude.

    Like

  4. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver abuse of an extremely vulnerable adult: Leonard Lawrence SL03D00938
    The non disclosure by HHJ Simon Oliver of Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3’s in 2012/3/4/5/6
    .
    HHJ Simon Oliver writes at point 27 on his Judgement dated 30 August 2012
    “H says that his counsel, at the hearing on 18th August 2005, says that the Official Solicitor did not agree the sale of the fmh at £622,000. However there is no evidence of this”.
    .
    A recent search by HMCTS of HHJ Simon Oliver files at Reading County Court, found the evidence to be with HHJ Simon Oliver. It had been there since 2011 and not disclosed to the Court of Appeal and the Court of Protection by HHJ Simon Oliver in 2012 and 2013.
    .
    “Particularly concerning”. was the failure Det Ch Supt Tim De Meyer, Head of Professional Standards, and Det Insp Gavin Tyrell, Head of Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police to investigate. Another Police Force have now identified offences of fraud and other more serious offence including perjury.

    Who ever sent me HHJ Simon Oliver’s emails a big thank you.

    Leonard Lawrence
    October 2016
    .
    p.s.
    Anyone with information on Simon Oliver please contact me or post on this site.

    Following a phone call from HHJ Simon Oliver to my barrister, Dorian Day St Phillips Chambers Birmingham, my Mr Day withdrew from my case, even when Mrs Justice Pauffley had directed HHJ Simon Oliver to send my case to the Court of Appeal. and HHJ Phillip Waller directed the case be sent to the Court of Protection .

    I had a enlighten call from a former barrister from Tooks Chambers who has encountered HHJ Simon Oliver.

    Like

    • Thank you very much for this. Yes I know Simon Oliver very well. He is a serious bribe artist. His salary is in the region of £70-110k a year but his company brings in £4 million a year, I doubt all this is clean money. I have personally and physically caught this man taking bribes and his superior Justice William Charles whom is the President of the Upper Tribunal refused to investigate it and said the tape recordings of the hearing are no longer available. This is not only perjury and fraud but serious organised crime!

      Like

    • What was the reply from his encounter with oliver? Can you also add the crime reference number of your police report to this blog so it can all be matched up to the criminal it relates to. Thank you

      Like

  5. Simon Oliver was responsible for my 2 children being put into foster care. I later realised the company that was fostering them was owned by Judge oliver. I was not happy to say the least. I’m sure this is not a coincidence and this judge stole my kids off me and started making money from it. Unfortunately, most judges are doing this. I’m sure his activities are illegal but I can’t do anything about it. Death be to judge Simon Oliver. It will be nice to see him die a painful death, possibly from terminal cancer!

    Like

  6. Yes social workers are the same most have their own adoption companies check out companies house when challenged they change name of company . Judge Oliver took my granddaughter and placed her with a family that are well know drug dealers even on sex offenders register have been convicted for it all and served long prison sentences but him and social services think she is safe there what a joke they all need stringing up

    Like

    • Thats what bribe artists do. Simon Oliver should be investigated by the police and senior government officials under the 2001 Special Measures Act and Misconduct in a public office but all these criminals are putting their bank accounts first and getting away with it. They never admit they take bribes but its obvious they do, we have caught this man physically in court doing it. Hanging should be the punishment for those involved in such activities as these judges are working against the public and for themselves

      Like

  7. Dear All,
    this upcoming court case on Thursday 3rd Nov
    in Chester County Court , Chester, Cheshire UK
    is rather special.
    .
    It has the ability to expose
    that the entirety of the authorities in Chester
    are ALL are evidenced
    by court documents,
    multicopy emails,
    media files ,
    official reports ….
    to have covered up , child rape,
    child sexual abuses,
    child batterings,
    child emotional abuses at torture levels,
    theft,
    coercive control,
    harassment,
    false imprisonment,
    false arrests,
    malfeasance in public office,
    perverting the course of justice,
    abuse of process …and on and on ..
    .
    These evil people are so arrogant
    and psychopathic
    that they have left trails
    of hard evidence
    heavily connecting all of this up.
    .
    They have fully isolated and gagged my children,
    even forced to be home schooled
    in order to gag them.
    Placed with a paedophile
    who sexually approached and interfered with my daughter.
    Placed with a mother
    who the children were battered by and lived in fear of.
    .
    Cheshire police simply refuse to investigate –
    because they and their freemason cronies are complicit.
    .
    Now, another half wit judge (Pearce)
    is publicly witnessed and evidenced
    as pushing the evidence away
    saying it does not exit.
    .
    He is publicly witnessed ,evidenced, recorded
    saying a penis forced into a child’s mouth
    is neither rape or a sexualised event ,
    and then saying to me and the public
    that ” it was only MY opinion ,
    ………..that evidence by police and professionals
    ………..stating a penis was forced into a child’s mouth
    ………..and genitalia to genitalia forced contact on the child
    ………..was neither rape, a sexualised event, or had been covered up”
    This vile sub hu man labled Pearce has obviously not read cps files on rape
    and he is willing to insanely state these things in public .
    .
    No court in the land has jurisdiction to make insanity valid.
    .
    He is publicly evidenced
    saying he can order people to see red books as yellow.
    .
    This is the level of corruption they have gone to
    in order to cover up their corruption.
    .
    …and historically they get away with it.
    .
    The judiciary says this imbicile is above the law in his court.
    .
    The judiciary says this man’s vile corruption
    MUST be fully open and accountable to the public ……
    so,
    we need you the public
    to witness this and report it ….widely ….
    ands is your legal civic duty.
    .
    If you can attend,
    I have evidence for anyone to witness who wants it,
    if you cannot attend,
    I would appreciate your help to get THE TRUTH out everywhere
    in bringing these evil people to public account ,
    and remedy a huge contribution to the industrial scale institutional child abuse.
    .
    http://www.moralpropositions.com

    Like

  8. I had Simon Oliver for my Upper Tribunal hearing and 3 months prior to the hearing taking place in a case management hearing, he asked me that he wants a gift of at least £6000 and that if I don’t have the money to pay him that I should carry out housing benefit fraud to generate the funds. I was incredibly surprised. He also asked me that he was very interested in stocks and bonds if I can give him some too.

    Like

    • Hi Sue, Yep its true. Apparently only the judges and lawyers are suppose to understand it because its their criminal racket system. This is why we need human rights. HHJ Simon Oliver openly took a bribe in open public court room on June 24th 2014 to dismiss the appeals. In fact he asked for the bribes.

      Like

  9. Well well well, looks like Judge Simon Olivers past is now finally catching up with him. This man has been ruining peoples lives and families and living the lifestyle from the bribes. This man is a true criminal. Only problem is that his superiors are the same and so is every judge in the land. We all have his address listed above, he hides it behind the trees, we should all go over there and take his belongings to refund our losses because he takes bribes. He has even asked NHS hospitals for holidays on beaches in return for fabricating judicial judgements so now hes stealing from other government funded bodies too at the risk of healthcare to patients. Please add all police reports and crime reference number in the comments so all police reports can be linked to this man nationally. And also widely distribute the site to everyone else as well, the campaign has had 200 shares on facebook so far. The more the better. All links are above to share this page.

    Thank you

    Like

  10. I was the barrister at a court hearing representing my client, a vulnerable adult. Judge oliver was the judge presiding the case. Judge oliver did a internet search on my clients address and stated that she has to give him 5% of the total value of her house to him as a gift. My client whom was renting the house did not get any sympathy or remorse from judge oliver who did not rule it in my clients favour. The matter is now going to europe under ECHR. This judge openly takes bribes and my client held me responsible for her losing money in legal fees. I was reported to the SRA for fraud when it was judge oliver who is the fraud. A corrupt judge to say the least. And yes all his judge friends and his superiors are involved in the same activities

    Like

  11. Judge Oliver came to my doctors surgery on the 15th August 2016. He reported in to reception openly stating he was there’ as part of the gift system’. I was somewhat amazed. I called my line manager over to ask her what he was going on about and she said that all i have to book him in as its the doctors orders. I was somewhat concerned he was openly stating he was there as part of a ‘gift system’ when judges have all along stated they never takes bribes. Dodgy man and a dodgy industry all these people are involved in.

    Like

    • wow now that is interesting ,

      I had a hearing around that time and he pulled some medical records out with similar name ,wrong dates and dob ,anything to damage someone’s reputations ,

      the records were of someone loosing or abort many children , when I only got 2 ,

      again a female judge who I recognized from previous criminal court in Westminster sat next to him whispered something and he had his hands over the micro ,all I heard is …..something something …comes with the gifts ,see how it goes ,

      he then looked over to my Young Barrister and somehow it looked like he flirted , he said to him we can leave it here less there is more to come ..perhaps ..looking amuse around …anyone.it was certainty a strange court hearing likewise to a circus , he is amused , and chuckled and everyone joined in ,

      Then he said to my Barrister can I see you in my chamber ,follow Hearing he did not turned up , and he held all fake names , dates against me even calling my child Princess is a wrong doing to him all his bizarre evidence be unfit in order to place child into care , I wish this crook be prosecuted soonest

      Like

  12. I need help on a judge called Justice Paufffley J, She sits in High court, and i have heard negative things about her from many many, people, back in 2015 there was a few people protesting outside the high court about a case she was doing a Satanic Cult Case which everybody believes she was covering up and looking out for these so called Pedophile and Baby Killers. Now, there’s nothing i can do regarding this because my lawyers fought hard to get my case appealed and, unfortunately she is the Judge who will be in task of making any findings and welfare decisions, i don’t have any hopes, but my Lawyer who’s just turned a QC, 6 months ago, tells me he will do his very best, but i know that if you leave it in the JUDGES hands it never goes your way, the Local Authority, have gone so far to even add more things they’re planning to seek against me, – why are family courts so corrupt?,

    if anybody has any news regarding this judge please let me know because everybody in the High court building told me very negative things about her

    Like

  13. Can somebody explain this whole corruption and bribe thing? Like at the end of the day. These judges have to go by the law and in their judgement they will come to their conclusion based on the law alone?,

    So how does this whole “gift” business happen in the court? I want to know whether these judges who write 100 page long judgement make crap up for just a gift?

    Lets just say, their was true allegations of sexual abuse, but the respondent party lawyer gave a gift to the judge and then for that, the judge gave back a judgement in his favour?

    Please answer my question back and hopefully if this is what is happening im truly in to STOP THIS INJUSTICE

    Like

    • Hi Frankie, yes it is true. The same system was in operation in the Stephen Lawrence case and it took the family 21 years to get justice. This probably doesnt happen where big companies or governments are involved, its more to do with everyday members of the public. A judge is not going to take a bribe if he heard a court case where the parties were bodies or organisations, he will only do it when a party is either unrepresented or when no one is looking. Judges like these ‘gifts’ but they dont always ask for it. The box is usually left in the court room in the eye of the judge. So lets says someone was accused of genuine child abuse and that party hired a ‘high priced lawyer’. His lawyer will say to him (some lawyers) that he is entitled to give a judge a ‘gift’. The ‘gift’ is placed in a box and left in the courtroom. The higher the value of this ‘gift’, the better and more favourable the judgement. Although very few judges take these ‘gifts’ and still come to the correct decision but in that way the party that bribed the judge will make sure (through their lawyers) never to give this judge a ‘gift’ again so the judge doesnt really make much money. A judge will lie in all their judgements. have you wondered why many people complain all the time about it as they obviously do not agree with it but most of these people are poor and have no money and cannot fight it as the case just goes to another judge whose also doing the same. When it comes to interpreting the law, yes you are correct but judges dont have to interpret the law, they just twist it and make any excuse not to accept your appeals. The court of appeal dismisses 99% of appeals unless it comes from a lawyer they are friends with. Therefore we need European courts whom rule in 80% of cases for us, the public!! This is why judges and governments do not like human rights laws and are doing anything to get rid of it as the government is ultimately paying out compensations to the public for false charges being placed on them. Lets look at it like this, if you took someone to court, have you got confidence you will win even though you are 100% right? no you dont because the judge will not do anything for you unless they do not get a ‘gift’. These judges and lawyers love placing false charges on members of the public because then they come to court and have to finance legal funding to defend themselves and even after that many appeal channels exist. The government has even got rid of legal aid because judges and lawyers were using it for their own criminal racket system making billions by falsely accusing members of the public of all sorts. A paedophile could technically get let off if the judge liked their ‘gift’. Have you wondered why they are so many appeal courts, because they dont trust each other. Judges have always taken bribes, we have physically seen Judge Simon Oliver do it but his superiors covered it up so thats why this webpage has been created to inform the public of this criminal acts. just read the comments above about this one judges activities and need i say more.

      Like

      • Ok let me get this straight,
        If this is true, how is this Judge even still employed as a Judge?

        Please can you tell me if you think Justice pauffley is a fair judge?

        Can Local authority, pay the judge to have the judgement in their favor too?

        In particular, Maidenhead Berkshire, my children were taken away as she made welfare decisions that they stay in long term care.

        I know justice pauffley is a senior judge been sitting at high court since 03′ but she could not decline a gift regardless of if she gets 100k a year or more.

        Please get back to me

        Like

      • Unfortunately it is true that high court judges also take gifts. I know senior high court judges take them and send people to prison for it without any accountability to anyone. Local authorities also give judges ‘gifts’ but only if they know they will lose and they will be named and shamed. All judges are taking ‘gifts’, they are not even ‘gifts’ but bribes just under a different header. Its a complete fraud system. The reason these judges are employed is because all of them are doing it and to prove something like that you need to prove it to the criminal standard and keep in mind no cameras in the court room and they place hands of microphones too.

        Like

      • The buden of proof is much lower in civil matters, even if that’s true doesn’t mean a Judge should find “A” responsible for sexually abusing “B” when there’s only video evidence and the complaints story alone. Any judge shouldn’t go far beyond the standard of proof in civil matters and say, im 100% certain that “A” abused “B” based on the whole evidence E.G video evidence. I truly believe only a criminal court should deal with those matters because their standard of proof is much higher.

        How some high court judges come to their conclusion based on video evidence as in ABE police interview alone without no live evidence from a witness is beyond my mind.

        I respect criminal judges more than family judges.

        Like

      • You are right, a criminal court is a better place but only because there is a jury to answer to. Its the jury that should be respected, not the judge. The judge still messes around everywhere. And most importantly family judges sit in criminal courts too and behave completely differently, thats because they know how the civil system works and that is that its riddled with a bribery system called ‘gifts’. A jury case complies with article 6 of the ECHR which is a right to a fair trial especially when it involves prison.

        Like

      • In my experience in criminal law, my friend was being tried for sexaully assault. But long story short CPS didn’t build up their case to the point where the judge ends up telling the jury to acquit.

        Now tell me where in a civil matter has a Judge ever gone beyond his/her powers to protect a inocent man’s name?
        Only when or if he’s rich does that happen. And when there’s good lawyers involved like QC”s

        I just think the family courts are only there to give local authorities what they want.

        Unless you can explain to me what a family court is for i will always believe its there for only 1 purpose no wonder why its not open to the public yet tax payers pay for those courts to run.!

        Like

  14. Speakers:David Wolfe, Douglas Silas, Principal, His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Judge Meleri Tudur, Judge Jane McConnell, Julie MoktadireLocation:Copthorne Tara Hotel, Kensington, LONDON , W8 5SR (GPS W8 5SY)Date: 07 March 2017 09:00 – 07 March 2017 17:00

    Let’s go and expose him for real guys 2017!

    Like

  15. So, their Judgements arent based on the law, but it’s based on their personal opinion.// i was acquitted in the criminal courts, but the family courts in the high court// and the judge Pauffley J, didn’t even look at the critical evidence// – My lawyers told me that i cant appeal the senior judges judgement, even if i have grounds of appeal. because she’s a top judge, you cannot appeal the court of appeals decsion either so that’s just so upsetting.// i believe in JUSTICE.but in this court of law. NO if you have money then you can definetly buy justice. but for the poor, no.

    Like

    • That is true. Judges know people will foot money to clear their name and if they don’t, the judge will make it worse. Its a criminal racket system. The criminal courts are trialled by jury whom are reasonable but the judge is the one messing around with the lawyers. You can appeal to the ECHR under article 6 which is a right to a fair trial. The european courts do not take bribes like the british judges do and are very pro human rights!

      Like

      • I cannot appeal my case. due to it being over the 30 day limit, plus, my lawyers told me it would not be successful appeal. // i now live my life, knowing this judgement will never go away. due to the fact i cant appeal it. there’s people who die in prison and years later they get justice. and there’s the family courts where there is no justice.

        Like

      • i cant appeal. i have gone beyond the 30 day limit. my lawyers told me i had no grounds to appeal, and that i would not be succesful in court of appeal. since she’s a senior judge and court of appeal judges are good friends with her as well, i did try to get other advice but i was very depressed and had to stay in hospital.

        Like

  16. Judge Oliver had my children put into long term foster care. He says he was willing to reconsider his position if I re mortgaged my house and gave him the share of the loan. I was not pleased but I neither had the money or my own home to re mortgage. I ended up giving my children up as I couldn’t make judge oliver ‘happy’. I know loads of people in the bershire area that have had dealings with this man. He has even received death threats once

    Like

  17. This man was asked me whether I can use my limited company to transfer £2 million pounds to him via an international bank transfer in return for a favourable judgment. I said NO WAY and requested a different judge. Avoid this money launderer at all costs. Question that comes to mind is where did he get £2 million from? Probably those gifts

    Like

      • Do you think all Judges take Bribes?,

        Lets exclude the judges sitting in the criminal courts.
        Since let’s be honest the jury get to decide the fate of the defendant. The judge of course then has to give a sentence, which of course needs to be in the guidelines.

        Unfortunately we’re talking about family court judges- Civil judges.

        If you do say, Yes then how can i prove Mr Oliver, didn’t screw me over during my hearing and took a bribe?

        I always believe once a bribe always a bribe.

        Hope to hear from you.

        Like

      • Hi
        Yes criminal judges do it too but they are more restricted in their judgement as the jury makes the verdict and yes the sentence is up to the judge which can be appealed. But all civil judges are taking bribes, its up to them whether they act on it but if they don’t, they might not get more bribes in the future as lawyers will advise their clients against it. Bear in mind, civil judges also work as criminal judges just as oliver does. It’s difficult to prove oliver to took a bribe but the judgement will show whether he did. For example, if he fills it with lies and fabrications, its common sense to say he took a bribe. Either that or hes incompetent which I doubt he is considering he knows how to put his hand on the microphone regularly. The stephen lawrence judges took bribes too and acquit the murderers but that was before jury cases were allowed. Thank you for European Laws!!

        Like

      • Hello,

        Thank you for your reply.

        So you’re saying All judges take bribes, even the High Court CIVIL judges, and the Court of Appeal judges?
        if this is true, then it would make sense how they dismiss so many appeals. i don’t understand these judges who do this, haven’t been caught and prosecuted. I personally, want some changes to happen in the Civil Law Procedure, for instance, a higher degree of standards of proof, it’s not fair that only in criminal matters, that they only get the highest degree of standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

        If a man is being accused of Sexually Abusing His Daughter, and The Judge uses that Standard of Proof.
        I honestly would have to say, that definitely, isn’t Fair, nor is it Right.

        What do you Think of the Criminal And Civil Cases Standard of Proof? do you think it’s fair to base allegations on probabilities or beyond a reasonable doubt. i’d pick the criminal way of proof. because for instance, any allegation of Physical abuse can be believed based on probabilities, whereas, in any criminal matter, the jury would acquit based on allegations and no proof.of course it’s very different when it’s a Sexual Offence. but i believe that the conduct and the procedure in this type of case in a criminal court is dealt with very fair. for instance you can question your witnesses. in criminal matters. in civil matters, you cannot question a child who makes sexual allegations, therefore your right to even question the only reliable witness is taken away from you in these cases. if your case is a serious case such as sexual abuse then you never will get a fair chance in the civil cases. since it’s got to be probable, to have happened to make such findings alone, not i find you guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Guys, you will have a fighting chance in a criminal case, whereas, in the civil matter, you’re screwed. My lawyer never told me that judges take bribes. so even your own lawyers aren’t trustworthy.

        Like

      • Hi
        The civil standard and criminal standard are not that different as much as judges say it is. If there is evidence someone is guilty, you will be guilty on the civil and criminal standard. Proof is proof. Although civil judges are more involved in bribery then anything else. And yes high court judges, criminal and civil as well as court of appeal judges also take bribes. If they are not taking bribes, they will not do anything for you if you don’t give them their bribe or ‘gift’ as they call it.

        Like

      • That’s actually really worrying. How even the High Court Judges, Top Paid are taking bribes.
        you mentioned, that the lawyers who do the dirty work, so how does that work? Like is it something similar to how sometimes, Prosecutors will tell lawyers they have so and so and offer a plea deal? and then in the Civil Courts, someone from the Judges Team either gets in contact and tells the Lawyers, I want so and so, for the Judgement in your Favor. This is very disturbing to realize.

        Like

      • No, you have got it all wrong. In criminal courts, theres too many people around to leave boxes or create deals in. In the civil courts, the party that knows they will lose a case under normal circumstances or the party that wants a big judicial judgement, they will leave a box lying around in the court room during the hearing, usually on the morning. The box is called ‘a gift’ and contains mainly money but also includes depending on the party giving it, holidays, cruises, stocks, bonds, sexual favours etc. The judge picks the box up when everyones gone home for the day or his court clerk will pass it on to them later. I referred to as ‘The gift system’. The judgement received is then completely in the favour of the party who gave the gift. Sad but true. We have caught judge oliver do this with our own eyes.

        Like

      • No one gets in touch with the parties, it all happens during the hearing. Remember, judges don’t ask for gifts but expect them. This is why when you never give the judge a gift, he will make your case worse out of spite. If you appeal or complain, it just goes to another judge usually the friend of the judge who messed it up in the first place. European court judges do not take bribes though.

        Like

      • If you don’t mind explaining, the following.
        1) how does the judge know which party gave the bribe
        2) what price would be enough to make a judge agree to the parties, wishes?
        3) what happens when the judge refuses the gift?.
        4) the part where you mention sexual favors, do you mean the lawyer is offering to the judge or the respondent?,

        Also, thanks to your website, i am trying to get my case back into the court of appeal. and get my findings dismissed. i feel that it’s very unlikely after you have mentioned that, judges take bribes, but i truly have great trust in this website to bring me justice.

        look forward to hearing back.

        Like

      • Answers to your questions are as follows:
        1) The judge does not know which party gives the gift. Its up to the party to offer it. The judge normally never asks for it unless he knows the lawyer whose representing the client.
        2) £8,000 is the minimum they would accept. Anything lower they would take the money but give the normal judgement. The more money, the more favourable the judgement. Although some clients also want to safeguard the money they give as they cannot trust the judge so they give variations of gifts such as £5,000 in cash and a holiday. If the judge goes on holiday, he can technically get into trouble if he doesn’t give the correct judgement.
        3) There have been cases where the judge has refused a gift. These are called ‘working judges’. They are working in normal jobs like everyone else. Although 95% do accept them. The lawyer for the party usually always informs the judge prior something like ‘a gift from our client’. If the judge accepts, its put away somewhere in the court room. In the High court, its usually the bookshelf in corner of the court room.
        4) Sexual favours could be the lawyer or the client. High priced lawyers would be more then happy to. Although there have been cases where prostitutes are used and even children (unconfirmed).
        Good luck in your appeal.

        Like

      • Appreciate your reply,

        OK, £8,000 is the minimum, Now, that makes my life seem meaningless, I mean, the Local Authority Has a lot of money, as you already know. so that’s no big issue for them. I just hate the fact my lawyers who were not as experienced as the QC which the LA had didn’t at the very least tell me about this ‘GIFT SYSTEM’ my children are worth more than £8,000.

        Unfortunately, i cannot afford to appeal since it’s going to cost me around £20,000. which i don’t have.
        Any suggestions? i mean, it’s now been almost 2 years since the Judgement was Given.

        Any Idea what i can do? i need guidance, solicitors aren’t giving me any good advice. lawyers are charging me £1000 for a hour conference. which i don’t have. i just need the truth. if theres nothing else i can do to get these findings overturned then i will give up,

        Like

      • Try an appeal to ECHR under article 6 which is a right to a fair trial and give your reasons but correct reasons. You cannot just make up that the LA gave the judge a gift when it can simply be the judge messed your case up because he expected you to give him one. Thats how the legal industry works. They place false charges on you and they expect you to foot the bill to clear your name. Many people are and have gone through this. Another way is create a blog making allegations against the judge in question and see if other victims comment on you site. That way, you can reopen your appeal if a clear pattern of corrupt practices exist. Remember why legal aid was removed for vast majority of cases except criminal ones, its because the government does not want to waste its money on these criminal network

        Like

  18. lets get this rolling ,..

    I copied my respond to the COMPLAIN I MADE perhaps you all can assist and send in the same reference number with your complain ,

    Our ref: 25855/2016

    12 December 2016
    Dear xxxxxx

    Your complaint about Judge Simon Oliver
    I write further to your email dated 18 November. I note that you wish to complain
    about the conduct of a tribunal judge.
    The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) supports the Lord Chancellor and
    Lord Chief Justice in their joint responsibility for judicial conduct and discipline by
    handling complaints about judicial office-holders both inside and outside of the
    courtroom.
    Complaints against tribunal judges must be made to the relevant Tribunal President
    in the first instance. Your complaint will only be considered by the Lord Chancellor
    and Lord Chief Justice in the event that disciplinary action is recommended by the
    President. I have, therefore, referred your complaint to Mr Justice Charles, President
    of the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) at 5th floor, 7 Rolls
    Buildings, Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL E: adminappeals@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk T:
    020 7071 5662.
    You can find further information about the tribunals’ complaints process at
    Please send any future correspondence directly to the Tribunal.
    If you require anything further, please contact me.
    Yours sincerely,
    Simon Parsons
    Judicial Conduct Investigations Office

    Like

  19. I know only if we all writing to the Simon Parsons he will be forced to act and will alarm someone else in charge as to many come to cover ,

    Also I called 02072301212 Met Police
    there listen then prefer you to your local well that is the problem ,
    as he is well in charge of the local Authority with his fabricated false accusations ,

    someone has to break this vicious circle

    Like

  20. Actually yes you are right , I spoken to Mr Charles ,he acted dumb, saying rudely what to you want me to do ,there is a Oliver retired ,one in Nottingham and one in Berkshire and no Oliver works here
    and what you asking me nothing on data’s or system when I got back to Parson he said sit still await result ,

    Like

  21. Thank you al for your support. You are doing very well. Keep posting and passing it around. This man has been ruining many lives and getting away with it. Lets show him he is not going to be covered up or protected by his friends upstairs. We the people have the power and we are the people who pay these judges through our taxes. If they want ‘gifts’, become a high class escort.

    Like

    • Hey, i wanted to know something regarding your reply to my earlier message.

      Will the lawyers tell their clients about this gift-bribe, or will he only ask people who aren’t on legal aid, and the people who pay directly from their own pockets?

      Its like the Local authority,
      Who have a ton of money so they probably ask the lawyers themselves right?

      I told the social workers, that my future is worh more thab 8k and showed them this website.
      They said Mr Oliver is the best judge in reading. I don’t know whether you’re from reading yourself, but for these social workers saying this. Its not a coincidence right?

      He gives them what they want and they love mr oliver very much she had a lot to say about him in my meeting with the council, its very dizarre the fact she calls him “the best judge”

      I hope to hear from you soon

      Like

      • They say hes the best judge because he gives them what they want. The social worker and mr oliver have a criminal racket going on where both parties are making money by placing more children in to care and then getting their own companies to look after those children. These are companies that are being paid for by the council.

        In regards to these bribes called ‘gifts’, all situations and judges are different but the party that wants to give the judge a gift will be entitled to. The lawyers usually advise their clients and yes these are privately funded lawyers that do this but legal aid lawyers may do the same too if they wanted to.

        Like

    • Hey,
      I dont know whether you got my last message or not, i will post it again.

      I wanted to know whether, Lawyers who are on legal-aid, tell their clients about thr “Gift-System”

      Or do Only lawyers of let’s say Direct Clients who pay by their pocket, who are rich individuals, get that talk with their lawyers about this “Gift-System”

      Well i can definitely, tell you my barrister didn’t mention this Gift-system to me.

      I know Local authorities, already know about this “Gift-System” & they know that in exchange for £8,000 they can have my children, and also, a judgement in their favor.

      The local authority, seem to love Mr Oliver very much, they say, hes the best judge in the reading area. No wonder they love him so much, when he gives them so many favors, in exchange for a few thousand pound.

      Very disappointed in this Law-System.

      Like

  22. I was on the sick, during my hearing, my solicitor, probably told my lawyers this.

    My Lawyers told me the Judge was a fair judge. Which lead me to believe the hearing would go my way.

    Unfortunately, it didn’t, now, i know everyone says when someone loses a case they will blame the judge. Well if the evidence is clear that im inocent, then of course i will blame the judge.

    I’m going to report both the judge and my lawyers who advised me very badly.

    Its true when they say justice can be brought. But if you’re poor it cannot.

    Look forward to hearing from you

    Like

      • Yes, Lawyers are always Liars in my View. My Lawyer Pretty Much just told me “Leave it to me, I will do everything i can to get you, the best outcome'” and when in the end he said “I don’t know what will happen only the Judge Knows”- I feel that the Justice System is so corrupt in this day and age, I feel that money is so important now that even the people who we are suppose to trust to judge fairly will, end up taking away our rights,

        Do you think a Jury Trial is Fair Or a Trial By Judge?, IMO, i’d say Jury, wbu?

        Like

      • Yes the jury is the best for a fair trial. It complied with european human rights. If it up to the judge, all the poor people will be locked up and all the criminals including the judges would be operating their judicial mafia extorting money from everyone. Lawyers never want to get in the bad books of the judges because that judge will make sure that lawyer loses all cases in future. Its one of the most ridiculous corrupt industries. Why go to university to be a lawyer, just college cereal box tokens for a free degree in return.

        Like

  23. I don’t know why, Civil (Family) cases are heard by a Judge alone?,

    Whereas a criminal cases the jury decide the fate and the judge can either dismiss applications or dismiss the case in its whole.

    What would you say a Fair Trial is?,

    I mean by all means, i woud love, if the family courts had jury who decided a persons fate.

    Why do you think this isn’t happening?

    As in why cant jury hear family civil matters involving children and in some cases allegations of physical and sexaul abuse?

    I hope to hear from you soon.

    Like

  24. Do you know why its so expensive to appeal to high court? Its £20,000.

    Like i don’t understand why its so expensive in my case we had new fresh evidence months later but was told that appealing would cost £20,000.

    If you know why please help me understand.

    Like

      • Lawyers and Judges care about money, and that’s all. end of the day, they aren’t your friend or family. some lawyers will challenge themselves and try winning cases for their names to get bigger and the bigger the name the bigger the cases, but as far as i’m concerned, Judges in Family Matters. Thanks to this website, aren’t going to win unless, the Judges get a bribe, and other than that, it’s pretty much a closed case for the other parties.

        I hope this website doesn’t close, i hope this website builds up and exposes more than just this Bribe-Artist.
        I really hope you’re having a good Christmas, Or if you don’t celebrate it then, Hope you have a wonderful New Year.

        Like

    • This is why she is doing it because she likes these judges to behave like this. We are sure the brexit was rigged as theresa may is making a big deal to leave but saying she is doing it for the public. Since when do judges, MP’s and anyone in a public position do anything for the public. If they did, why don’t they start by sorting out their judicial system rather then infringing our human rights by taking I away. Is theresa may saying we are not human now?

      Like

      • This world is corrupt.
        Theres so much going on in the world which everybody isn’t really aware of due to the media.

        Judges are always being appointed and geuss who appoints them? Yours truly the queen. I dont believe in justice, not in this world.

        Everything is riggged
        Sad thing is we pay these people to live their lavish lifes. Whilst we suffer.

        #fuckthersamay

        Like

      • Its not just theresa may that is the problem, if you go to other countries, there people clearly and openly say there judges and politicians take bribes. its the western world that are brainwashed more then anything. when someone in britain does not get a correct judicial judgement, rather then immediately think its bribery involved (which it most probably is), they start figuring out what happened. its simple, it real life bribery going on in front of the public. if the public got together andall started saying it, it will most probably stop but everyone is on a different planet that they do not want to understand. judges and lawyers love it when the public do not use the ‘bribery’ word because that means they can keep on doing it. as soon as you accuse them of bribery, they get all funny. if you use the words they use which is ‘gifts’, they know they are in trouble because they cannot let that get out. so if anyone is concerned about a judicial judgement and its filled with lies and fabrications, quote ‘the gift system’ and you will understand. we have to thank judge simon oliver to help us expose this system, if it wasn’t for him, we would still have a problem understanding it.

        Like

  25. Judge oliver once asked me in the middle of the court room that he will rule it in my favour if I can give him 4 cheques of £25000 each in return for cash money. I was somewhat concerned at his remark. Either he was trying to stitch me up with false charges or he was trying to use me to launder his money. Complaining about him would be pointless as it will not go anywhere.
    BEWARE OF THIS JUDGE.

    Like

  26. I remember a case where a famous person was accused of satanic cult and baby killing, and it was dealt by Justice Pauffley in the High court, there wasn’t no crown court case at all, i have the judgement saved on my computer, and at the end of the day, He defiantly gave her a GIFT to for this judgement. the case will forever be one of the cases which will forever leave me very concerned about the way the judge dealt with the case and the poor children involved and it for sure is a case which will of course show how much the judge favored the ‘MAN’ who was a famous actor, it’s sad to see. but if you want to look at the judgement then feel free and search for it.

    Re P and Q (Children: Care Proceedings: Fact Finding) on google.

    and let me know what you think about it.

    Thanks.

    Like

  27. I don’t understand.
    My case with HHJ oliver was very simple. The allegations were retracted from the children of physical abuse, but the findings he made were that my children were physically abused by me.

    Now tell me that’s injustice.
    When there’s a retraction made it should be taken seriously right?

    In criminal law it will end up being a no case to answer. But this corrupt judge still made findings against me when the children made a retraction.
    I feel its because im a pakistani muslim and hes being very stereotypical by making those findings since all muslims beat their kids.
    Corrupt judge. I live in reading myself for 30 years now.

    Like

  28. I had Oliver and he ruined my child’s life. I’ve never seen anything which is such obviously a farce, unjust and morally reprehensible in my life. There is no justice in this Country, Judges decide on the outcome before you enter the Courtroom according to their own personal bias. Rule of law has no place in a Courtroom. Judgements are written before given with the collaboration of the lawyer and the entire case whether it be an initial Hearing or appeal depends on the friendship and previous interactions of the Judge and lawyer. They aren’t called advocates for nothing…the lawyers work for the Judge, not you and they all want to sit where the Judge is so they will curry favour to advance themselves. Sod you and your case, you are no use to their advancing careers. The Judges were once lawyers lets not forget. The local authority are bound to publish a certain proportion of their expenses quarterly and the amount of money they pay to the local Court for applications is astronomical, paying for their applications to be granted more like, not to mention other party lawyers undertaking ‘misc’ legal services payments for them at the same time as the proceedings they were in…….There is evidence my matter was pre planned, instigated by Oliver, also that social workers falsified and fabricated evidence which I have recorded by email as one worker, ‘deleting’ case file records. Everything from that point on was an exercise in amusement and money by the legal faction. They seem to enjoy inflicting the cruellest of endeavours and outcomes. I also have evidence that my judgement was flawed from emails from the Court. My child was stolen and given to a person who is a drug dealer and abuser. My child has suffered greatly and continues to deteriorate. The local authority are now on special measures having been branded inadequate by OFSTED: lets hope that gets rid of them all one way or another and the last time in Court, Oliver appeared to have a supervisory element to his Courtroom as in another person sat behind him. The local police have seemed more interested this time in not only holding the LA to account yet also criticising Oliver and his directives which may be a smokescreen however is welcome none the less.

    On a side note, McFarlane has been cited as covering for Lady Justice King (her of the bribery investigation when she was a barrister). He doesn’t grant any appeals for Oliver either and goes against his own and Munby’s rulings when he does hear you. http://www.divorceandthecity.co.uk/dyslexia-and-justices-who-cover-up-their-disability-when-not-declaring-it-on-their-judicial-appointment-form/

    Like

  29. The comment has been posted twice so please remove one. The other person in Court was around Feb last year. Following Oliver being sent to Oxford for a few months.

    Like

  30. Is is this working? Has anyone achieved justice or is there any change for anyone? Peace is not a state that comes to mind having been subjected to dealings with the Court and this Judge.

    Like

    • If he is convicted of anything do you think there is any chance of his cases being looked at again regarding his judgements on children that have been taken and given to drug dealers on sgo that have served long sentences for supplying class a drugs and on sex offenders register maybe they have him a gift

      Like

  31. is it worse to been acquitted in criminal court, and then have ‘findings of fact’ made against you in Family Court?
    This one’s been bothering me for some time, since, i feel the acquittal meant everything to me, then there’s the Family Court Findings still sitting there, i don’t know what to think, i feel that 12 people acquitted me is far better than one piece of shit judge who made findings against me.

    Like

    • He didn’t make a finding of fact, he fabricated that finding. Its simple, when a judge does not give proper reasons for his judgment, its very likely he’s been taking bribes. If he hasn’t taken a bribe, he accepts you to give him one in return for clearing his name. He’s even been asking for cheques from other people in return for cash money to clean all that criminal money he’s been making.

      Like

      • Ok he didn’t give me any reason for the findings he made against me.

        Now aren’t you suppose to give detailed reasoning or can judge refuse to explain his reason for the conclusions hes made?

        In my case he read a few documents and then he said i believe so and so did happen. I don’t need to explain why because im satisfied its true.

        ;/ justice system is fucked up!

        Liked by 1 person

      • No hes not suppose to be saying that. A judge has to give clear and detailed judgments and decisions. So clear in fact that there would be no need to appeal all the time. He has been regularly making false findings of fact. He does this because hes taking bribes to ruin your reputation whilst he gets called ‘his honour’. There is no honour in this man. How can you call someone honour when they not honourable.

        Like

  32. I never called him “your honour”
    I only referred to him as “sir”

    Yes, the judgement was very quick, overall it was only a few pages to read.

    I didn’t have a experienced lawyer too. In fact, it was 2 solicitors against a very experienced barrister QC.

    You cannot be successful in court if you’re on legal aid. And your solicitor is going against a QC.

    I don’t care what people say “you cant afford a QC” its not like the local authority paid their QC out of their own pocket.

    My judgement wasn’t fair because a Judge says i believe the abuse occurred.

    Surely you need Physical Evidence? Their were no hospital records where my children suffered any physical injury.

    Now i don’t know what your definition of physical abuse is but, if there’s hospital records which show nothing. Nor is their school records showing nothing,
    Then based on the prinability test which is implied in family courts i should have had no findings, in other words the jury would have acquitted me.

    It’s like a person was alleged of sexaul abuse of a 5 year old girl, she was checked and her hymen wasnt harmed nor was their physical injury to the anus. But the child being 5, surely their would have been signs, so if tje probabilities test wad implied in this scenario the alleged perpetrator would have been found inocent of any wrong-doing.

    This system is rigged.

    Like

    • Its rigged because a bribery system is in place called ‘The gift system’. Basically 1 QC doesn’t mean anything. The truth is the truth but how can a QC convince a judge the allegations are true? The truth is he. Doesn’t, he just gives the judge a box with money inside it and a letter asking what he wants in the judgment and thats what they get. Are you trying to say a judge cannot understand a member of the public correctly unless he speak in legal jargon. Thats nonsense. He chooses not to understand it but rather listen his friend, the QC whose also giving him ‘gifts’

      Like

      • How long has the gift system been around for?

        If this Judge takes bribes then i cannot allow myself to just sit and be quite. I am willing to go ask a solicitor or lawyer to help me get my case overturned because of the fact Judge oliver takes bribes and his judgement is unsafe.

        What do you think are my chances of being successful?
        Or are solicitor and lawyers going to say that what im saying is “nonsense”

        Or in other words could i myself get into trouble for saying this?

        Thanks

        Like

      • Well lawyers and judges are involved in it. Its a way to make money. No lawyer will say a judge takes bribes because all judges are taking bribes. The gift system has been operating for decades. It was how the stephen lawrence murderers got off the first time and how ryan giggs got a super injunction and the list goes on and on. The judge is the mafia boss and lawyers and all legal professionals cater to this judicial mafia boss. So basically what I am saying is that if you went to a lawyer, they will take your money, waste your time and never even mention the bribery because if they do, oliver will make sure that lawyer starts losing all their cases and will become unappealing to clients

        Like

      • If i paid a lawyer and showed him this website and he told me it was a total nonsense then of course i will straight away pay the lawyers and leave end of story.

        This website is enough to get any judgement made by Judge oliver re-evaluated and overturned.

        Please tell me that this website has been looked at by police and that judge oliver is being investigated?

        Like

      • Hello Tariq. Im not sure how many looked at it but just to let you know all judges are taking bribes, not just oliver. It goes on into the superior courts using the same system of gifts. The police do not want to investigate these judges because they rely upon them as well. If you hired a lawyer, they will not have the balls to challenge a judge because I said before the judge is the mafia boss and lawyers technically work for him. Your best bet is to go to the police if your case was deliberately mishandled by police. I you read the comments on this site, plenty of people are commenting on oliver taking bribes, so much as they state hes asking people to transfer millions of pounds in to international bank accounts.

        Like

      • I don’t know if this has been asked before but is Oliver still a Judge in Reading County court?
        Or is he still working in London crown court?

        If so, let’s all go and protest and get this corrupt judge locked up.

        Police can’t stop us.
        Freedom of speach.

        Like

      • He works at both. He now works at oxford as well. His main base is reading county court but he works at london upper tribunal, isleworth crown court, oxford crown court and many other courts in the surrounding areas. Yes we should all protest or you can also create your own website against him about your experiences. The more information about oliver, the better the chances of him being unsuccessful doing the same to others. Open up a website and post the link here and the same goes for everyone else as well.

        Like

      • Ok, if lawyers wont do nothing nor police, then what’s can we do?

        Cannot allow this injustice to carry on forever.

        Surely enough is enough?

        Like

      • I hope nobody has to go through this system, its rigged and its not fair, i have not been around long enough to know when this corruption in the legal system started but we can be sure its been going on for a very long time. Now i have although been around long to notice so many injustice being done in the legal system. Its sad to think there’s inocent people who are doing life for smoking weed. Whereas there’s rapists scrolling our streets openly, our justice system is there for a reason of course, but it is also being used and abused, inocent families who cannot understand the system ate being played with, its sad and upsetting that, money can get you literally anything.

        Never leave your life in the hands of corrupt judges, i understand people get arrested for silly reasons, but the best advice i can give anyone is,

        Keep your circle small, and stay out of trouble, & if you’re poor and get involved in family proceedings, then you’re screwed.

        Like

      • Yes big business adoption probably why most social workers have their own private adoption companies and when challenged they shut them down and start again under different name they are all corrupt

        Like

      • Social workers….are scum.

        They invent lies into children’s minds.

        And no nothing but lie.

        I don’t know why anyone would want to be a social worker i dont know how they sleep at night.

        Like

  33. CAFCASS officers aka social workers have vested interests in Core Assets (Fostering and Adoption) for contact observation sessions with the aim of placing your child in long term care or for adoption. CAFCASS are jointly funded with CORAM whom are the 3rd largest national adoption agency (conflict of interest anyone?) and CAFCASS CEO is the ex chair for the British Association of Adoption and Fostering! CORAM state that CAFCASS and they recommend adoption in cases where the parents cannot agree on residence or contact……….the further down the rabbit hole you go……………Oliver is a Care Judge and sits in the South Eastern Circuit which includes London and Oxford. I’ve been told by the admin staff that Judges are lazy at Oxford and by the JCIO that workload was responsible for the flawed and unlawful judgement we received and we shouldn’t complain about the Judge, basically. Keep appealing. Appeal the fact finding, keep banging on the legal avenues.Get the press involved, it sways the opinion of the Court and the Judges are more cautious. Take any action which can be reported on or put in the public domain. That’s what they fear, exposure because then their secret is out and someone somewhere will take notice.The more that speak out, the better. Briscoe (recorder) was jailed for lying to police so it can be done although I think that was more a political move. Silence is deafening and stronger than even one voice. 3 Judges were sacked from the High Court recently for using their computers inappropriately so someone somewhere is objecting to Judges misuse of office. It has to be made known to someone who can do something about it. Keep shouting it from the rooftops. Even the High Court Judiciary may become disenchanted if the lower Court Judges continue. Lobby Munby, your MP. We need numbers and a determination to continue to try to expose this.

    Like

    • Workload is not the reason for flawed judgments and false findings of fact, its the gift system in place. Jusges are taking bribes using a system referred to as the gift system. The falsely accused will have to appeal which mean lawyers once again come together, which mean more money, more legal aid and more gifts to the judge. So its simple to say that YES JUDGES TAKE BRIBES AND THAT INCLUDES OLIVER

      Like

      • My children have been in care for 5 years nearly (long term)

        Social workers have lied on multiple occasions regarding their safety and how they are.

        My eldest came home (ran home) and told me everything.
        Hes 14 he said he hates it their and he only gets a hour of freedom and he told me they brainwashed him with lies about how bad we were.

        Reason i gave up with going back and forth with court proceedings is they got get me anywhere they bring up lies and use social workers as “expert witnesses”

        If anything the criminal system treated me fairly and dropped my case of ‘Child cruelty” which even today i respect some of the people who decide to Charge or drop the case they think propearly not ruin lifes.

        People won’t understand my family doesn’t either. I had number of people’s assessment to take my chuldren such as family members and all didn’t fit the requirements and wasn’t allowed to take my children.

        So finally,
        I don’t have money or time anymore to try and fight for my kids future because the courts are corrupt abd judges only listen to social workers.

        My children will know the truth and (at least) my 14 year old will when he turns 18 he will be welcomed back home these people wont support him after he turns 18.

        What do kids who turn 18 get after they leave care?

        Nothing!

        As far as the “Findings” made against me, they wont mean nothing to me, they are lies.

        So anybody who’s children are in longterm care, keep strong.
        And wait because your kids will return back home at 18.

        They receive your letters and gifts, they will get your details and i promise you they will contact to meet you as soon as they turn 18.

        I haven’t had no contact for 5 years other than the time my child ran home.

        All in All, sometimes if you’re rich enough you can definitely get justice.( family courts)

        Like

      • Totally agree in her report the cafcass working said that she had spoken to me on several occasions about proceedings. Joker all she EVER said to me was hello she couldn’t even look me in the eye . I was unable to say anything because I was refused to be made party to proceedings by Oliver even though I had passed assessment after having an independent one done not by local authority

        Like

  34. Judge robins of milton keynes family court will happily break the law … its time to make family courts .. public
    Have fact based evidence, no more hearsay … They all in it for profit …

    Like

  35. Past few weeks i have tried getting this website heard & so many people have told me this website is Bullshit.

    I felt like i didn’t know what else to do. Even the police told me it was nonsense

    It’s made me think how some higher up people deal with matters which go against people who they “Like”

    Sp i wanted to know what response i could give back?

    Like

    • Quote ‘The gift system’. No one really likes to admit bribery goes on in britain. The police and the higher up’s are the worst ones covering these issues up. When was the last time the police helped a real victim of crime unless they were rich or famous or maybe the media reported it. Its response like the ones they have told you is why judges do actually take bribes because no one will believe it. The reason is they have brainwashed everyone into thinking its not true. Lets look at how many comments have been written on this website, these are many different people putting their experiences forward. They can’t all be wrong or lying. So overall, if anyone tries to say this website is talking rubbish, refer to the comments section and what the public is saying.

      Like

      • Seems like a great thing.
        I suppose most of the people have read the entire page and comments and yet still chose to disbelieve in it.

        You cannot always win.

        Most of the people who i have contacted are police and a few lawyers.

        And the laayers much like police claimed it was rubbish..

        You cannot win even if you tell them to look at the comment section they won’t believe in this.

        So if police and lawyers call it rubbish who can you go to?

        I believe in everybody story on this page.

        Its ridiculous how hard it is to get things heard.

        Like

      • Lawyers and police rely on judges like oliver to help them get what they want. Mainly for lawyers, its money and big win cases and the police to win big cases and the officers getting promoted to the top jobs. The strongest people to go to is the media and the public. These lawyer and judge criminals fear the public getting together and taking action against them so they pretend it doesn’t happen. Imagine a police officer taking criminal action against a judge, that police officer will lose all cases in court and will no longer be employable. Listen to the public, they tell the truth. Judges, lawyers and police officers all lie. History has told us. How come these judicial judgements do not make sense!

        Like

      • That’s what they want people to roll over and accept it . Great if I had the money to buy my grandchildren back .It is barbaric what goes on and the children that suffer the most when they are supposed to be protecting them . NEVER again will I allow my self to have any dealings with social workers and family courts i feel that they are all corrupt I can’t understand how they can sleep at night . Disgusting.

        Like

      • The police or lawyers will say media is lying too?

        Yes i understand how a lawyer or police will fear speaking up for everybody because they will lose their jobs and everything.

        Police won’t get involved either way i have tried telling them.

        People should all speak up.

        Some families are told like myself to move on and get on with your life? Is that really the best thing to be told?

        I can imagine them going through the same process and seeing them use the same crap advice.

        Like

      • Yes!

        Once a bribe always a bribe.

        I agree we can spread the message and hope to get heard.

        Get this corrupt judge exposed.

        Like

      • They do believe it, they just don’t want you to believe it otherwise they don’t make any money. Whats the best way to extort money out of the public? Blackmail them by holding their children hostage under false charges. Any parent would do anything for their children including finding money to get them back but what if they have nothing to give the judge? Well, your in trouble then. Lets make it clear, there are no gifts in the court system but bribes!

        Like

      • Its even more sad to know that the lawyers don’t mention the bribe system and that you’re going to get screwed until the judgement is been given.

        So pretty much anybody on legal aid isn’t getting any fair judgement.

        Only people on direct access probably get justice?

        Either way, its ridiculously unfair when there’s serious allegations involved and nobody seeks to question the children/ then at the end its all about who has the better story/submission.

        Whoever is the strongest on the submissions in the end ultimately wins.

        Doesn’t matter about the truth whoever has a better story wins.
        Of course whoever has money too wins.

        Family proceedings are pretty much all about submissions and whoever has the best story.

        Some lawyers can make you feel very guilty when in fact you’re inocent.

        This is a game to judges and they have clearly came into the profession knowing how to play.

        It’s crazy how some lawyers feel £177k isn’t enough to be a judge
        Whe of course they knw they can rake up more on bribes.

        Like

  36. Had oliver at my hearing as well. He puts his hand on the microphone and asks for gifts. When I never gave him one,he started doing hand signals as hes not interested and ruled in the opponents favour because he received a box from them. He said to me later that him and his partner will be going to select a new car in the next two weeks and the car will be a mercedes.A crooked judge to say the least.Police refused to investigate because he has them in their back pocket.Well done for publishing this,now someone has to take action.My Cris reference number was CR12650.Spread the word.

    Like

      • How do Bribes Happen in the Criminal Justice System?…
        I understand how they happen in a secret Family Court Proceedings, but what i don’t understand is how it happens during a Criminal Proceedings where the courts aren’t in SECRET. and where the JURY are the deciders.
        of course a judge can if the person (A) is found guilty, sentence him to a higher sentence, but (A) can go appeal that and get it reduced to a lower sentence, so it’s very confusing how bribes happen in a criminal court.

        Like

      • Bribes do not take place in criminal courts. The vast majority of criminal courts are fair. Its the civil court system that is riddled with bribery. You are right about the criminal courts and sentencing but to sentence someone to a higher sentence can happen but the person that I bribing the judge must want that person in prison pretty bad like a business partner etc. I is also very risky to bribe judges in criminal courts because many people are around so its unlikely it happens. Its the civil court like the tribunals, family, county etc that do bribery on a wide scale

        Like

  37. I have by chance come across your website. I TOO HAVE BEEN A VICTIM OF A COMPLETE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE BY JUDGE SIMON OLIVER in Reading County Court. He passed judgement against me in my Hearing v ex-husband and non-payment of my Consent Order WITHOUT EVER READING THE EVIDENCE SUPPLIED. I feel sure he was working with my ex-husband’s Barrister, and/or is completely incompetent.

    NOTE: I had previously taken my case to Slough District Court, where a totally competent, professional Judge ruled in my favour, but did not have the power to pass judgement. I had a transcript of this Hearing I took onwards to Judge Oliver.
    Judge Oliver was so unprepared, he decided he needed a second day (whole day), but had ‘forgotten’ this by the time both parties & barristers attended for the full day Hearing. He had by then allocated other Cases, and we only had a few hours … so he then allocated a third day. The total of these 3 Hearings cost me thousands of pounds in addition.
    At the beginning of this second Hearing, he took my Barrister to one side and advised he didn’t realise … but he was writing an update of his book with my ex-husband’s Barrister !!!! He said it would have no bearing at all on my Hearing, but I had 20 mins to decide whether to proceed. I decided to do so, feeling that British Law could be trusted to be fair, impartial and totally trustworthy.

    How wrong I was!
    After 5 months, I received my Judgement and there were so many FACTUAL errors, my Barrister complained to the Court. Judge Oliver corrected some of the inaccuracies, but refused to correct them all – even though ALL could be substantiated by evidence including letters supplied by the Trustee in Bankruptcy (against my ex).

    I took my complaint against Judge Oliver to the Judicial Council Investigations Office (JCIO) who are, it transpires, powerless. They themselves were so disorganised and didn’t read my Case thoroughly, I went to their Ombudsman, who simply decided my Case ‘did not amount to misconduct’.

    Last year I took the matter to my local MP and have just had a letter back from Rt Hon Elizabeth Truss MP, saying she has looked at my concerns, but that ‘matters relating to judicial competence are not covered by the statutory framework’. What does that mean? It means, in essence, that a Judge can act in exactly the way he wishes and IS NOT ACCOUNTABLE TO ANYONE.

    I have no faith in our country’s judicial system any longer and would fully support anything that exposes and brings to justice Judge Simon Oliver.

    Like

    • He probably deliberately increased the number of days to the hearing so the other side can get together any bribes or gifts for him. Jusge Oliver has a habit of usually getting one his clerks (freddy cutts from reading county court) to contact the opponent and requesting gifts. Beware of this judge, he does not make mistakes, he does it deliberately because hes using a bribery system called gifts.

      Like

    • You should now report the matter to the police and get a crime report number and put it in the comments of this website. The reason the matter should go to the police is because Judge oliver has committed perjury by lying in his judgment (once again). He has also perverted the course of justice and carried out fraud. Whether he was once again taking gifts like he does in the upper tribunal is yet to be determined but maybe he did.

      Like

      • In my own opinion though.
        It all depends on the matter that’s being brought to court.

        The only matters which are probably more serious than any matter in a Family court is “Sexaul abuse” and of course no matter the outcome it most certainly leads to criminal proceedings if things go wrong in the first instance.

        Other than that if you’re on legal aid you probably will never be asked for a bribe from a Judge since solicitors know your circumstances and your financial situation, and of course when filling out your legal aid form you let them know your savings ect.

        If you’re paying direct. Then you of course can escape.

        Even the people who are inocent and that have nothing against them will get no justice and end up losing their case. Even though it’s not a game but trust me it is a game to judges.

        Like

      • Yes lawyers and judges are involved in a money making racket system. they get together with the public or officials bodies to make false allegations and charges against innocent people, teachers and healthcare workers and then expect them to bring I to court and foot the bill in legal costs as well using the judges lawyer friends who gives the judge a percentage of the earnings.

        Like

      • That’s a silly thing for a judge to ask.

        I, cannot understand why this Judge hasn’t been caught yet even when his ways of getting bribes is very stupid..

        I for all if i had the opportunity would record this and go to the police. Its not even a matter of question. If my solicitor or the judge asked i straight away would go to police.

        Housing benefit- i mean that will not give you £8000 on the stop, i don’t know why jude oliver asks ppl to do this scheme..

        All in all it is unbelievable hes still in reading county court. Even when this website is exposing him to a point where he needs to be dealt with or sacked.

        Like

  38. I had Judge Oliver deal with my case at Slough county court. He wanted a closed hearing and all people in the public gallery were asked to leave. Thats when and only when Judge Oliver said openly that we have to all give his ‘gift’. And we have to give it to his clerk called ‘Freddy cuts’ who will pass all gifts to judge Oliver. If this is not a bribe,what is?

    Like

  39. I had this man, Judge Simon Oliver came to a local bar and club in London and started chatting me and my friend up. Mr Oliver asked me and my friend for a gay threesome at a later date in a nearby hotel which was costing him £700 a night. Me and my friend came and Judge Oliver asked my friend to tie him up to the door and spank and bondage him. He went on to say that he enjoys having his penis pulled in a clockwise motion. After 20 mins of this, it was my turn and judge Oliver asked me to slap him and gag him. After giving him a few slaps, he got aroused. He then asked me to dress up as a vicar and clamp his nipples and he had the vicar outfit in the cupboard. At this point, me and my friend were really creeped out and just made a run for it whilst Mr Oliver was still tied up. A truly strange character. He even told us that he regularly used escort services in the London area. I was amazed to hear he was a family judge because he doesn’t act like a family man.

    Like

  40. I think the only reason bad decisions happen in family court is because of the burden of proof being on the balance of probabilities.. its a joke to me because in criminal proceedings its beyond a reasonable doubt.

    I feel if the buden of proof was the same in Family matters bad decision would at the very least be reduced but of course- there should be a jury to sit in Family cases too. Especially in cases involving child sexwul abuse.

    Cannot trust 1 judge word alone.
    Its funny how judges will write up 30 page judgements and still don’t explain how they come to the conclusion.

    Like

    • Actually the balance of probabilities standard of proof is not that much different from the criminal standard. If proof exists, thats proof but in criminal proceedings, procedures have to take place. In civil cases, these procedures can be overlooked but the fact remains proof is proof and a judge cannot just say somethings fact without proof. He only does it when he has been taking bribes in the form of gifts. When you challenge these judges decision, they never want to respond

      Like

      • I disagree with you in regards to the burden of proof being not much different.

        Balance of probabilities
        And beyond a reasonable doubt are two different buden of proof

        I would pick beyond a reasonable doubt anyway of the week.

        There’s s huge differencce.

        Balance of probabilities is basically 0.51% has to be true wheress beyond a reasonable the buden of proof the the highest the jury has to be certain beyond a reasonable that the crime took place. If not acquitt.

        Like

  41. please everyone in Berkshire or SURROUNDING AREA of READING who had dodgy dealings with the dodgy judge in the Family Court

    write your complain to THAMES VALLEY POLICE “<richard.johnson@thamesvalley.pnn.police.co.uk"

    He is the Officer in charge for child abuse ,neglect etc. also send him the link of the crooked judge too ,
    he has to do something ,

    same with MP Richard Benyon is for Newbury or your own MP their may ignore one but not if a constant complain from different parties
    so to encourage keep on at it , is for our children who are not safe right now ,suffering under the misconduct of dodgy authorities who stealing our parent hood ,and the child's childhood

    Always remember , we do not have to earn our RIGHTS WE have RIGHTS Human Rights
    which comes with a fair trial , and peaceful environment without interfering within our families ,
    we have a voice also our children have voices and all seem to be suppressed by man made dodgy rules and dodgy authorities who follow script of the one who put false accusation together and adding and adding ,with reward of a handsome public funding using our children ,
    making a slander against your good name and family , as in the Judges favoured word a mockery , yes a mockery to us

    lets get something done about it , speak out ,write out , get it out there ,thought we all were threatened by the Judge , as myself of 6 years in prison if speak to anyone in the world about this , very charming perhaps he should be in that place for each of us 1 year ,how many years for him , ? anyhow TRUTH always will come out eventually

    Like

  42. All i know is that Civil and Criminal are both different.

    I know the burden of proof in civil is the lowest.

    And in criminal is the highest.

    There’s obvious reasons why its higher in criminal law since prison is involved and a person could be sent to prison for many years.

    But in civil law it’s lower it’s only got to sound compelling. As in whoever has the better case submissions and story wins. Its got nothing to do with evidence since as we all should know by know the judges don’t care about evidence especially from Doctors who come in ad experts.
    I’ve seen many cases where doctors evidence has been rejected and where a Judge has came up with his/her own opinion.

    You cannot ever get a fair hearing in civil courts/ family proceedings..its in secret and its decided by 1 judge who doesn’t care about YOU.

    Of course a jury doesn’t care too but a jury will always look at evidence and personal experiences and will come to a conclusion based on evidence alone.

    Local authorities- who bring proceedings to the lower courts/ higher courts have the bigger pockets and the judges will always listen to their experts and believe their stories.

    As far as bribes of course Lawyers get paid more than judges therefore judges wilk most definitely think of a way to make more money and of course the local authority who bring proceedings will always be willing to give a sum of money for q verdict in their favor.

    And the fact-finding cannot ever be overturned- in the court of appeal so therefore families will never be able to get any justice.

    The court of appeal judges will never oveturn a senior judges fact-finding, its very rare.

    Local authorities are always looked after by judges. There’s never been a time where a local authority has lost a case dealing with adoption or any allegations regarding children matters. Even when the “RESPONDENTS” case is very strong a Judge will always side to the LA. ALWAYS.

    Like

      • Although i take your word for it.
        And understand the European courts are fair- i don’t have anytime to go find a lawyer who will fight my case in the European Court-

        I think im way out of time for any appeal or hearing.

        And if the LA were to come along they definitely would find a way to win.

        It’s a different system because it’s all submissions and writing, not much talking- therefore, any lawyer who’s been in the game long enough knows it’s all about who’s pen-game is the strongest and that’s all it takes.

        This is the main reason i respect criminal court better- bring case forward-witnesses testify, ending arguments, – evidence- then jury decide.

        And best thing about everything you have a right to give evidence in criminal courts whereas in family court- you don’t.

        Like

      • Absolutely correct. Although i must say the european courts really do not take any nonsense from anyone regardless if they have high priced lawyers. Lawyers and judges know europe will not rule in their favour unless they can reasonably give reasons for their decisions which vast majority of civil cases don’t do. The law was created to protect the public but these judges and lawyers turned it in to a money making racket

        Like

      • Any cases from UK that went to European Court and got Justice?

        I don’t believe in justice. I feel that family courts are only their to punish children and families.

        Especially children who go into care and don’t understand why and end up having issues when older and end up homeless when older.

        Its tragic its not right nor is it JUSTICE.

        Local authorities and social workers are always believed in the family courts and its sad.

        Like

      • Yes, I agree there’s never any reasoning or evidence in Judgments- judges will go and write 10-20 pages judgement and in the end come to a conclusion favoring the LA.

        I read recently read a case where a Judge went through the entire background of the case-

        Through the Allegations and what the both sides are saying.

        And in the end says “After analysing the entire case i have come to a conclusion that” – the children were indeed abused by the parents,

        I even read up q case where 2 children where saying they were being abused by teachers and police and doctors in school ect it was a satanic cult case.

        The children weren’t believed at all. The case wasn’t investigated nor were the children’s allegations. Even the children had been examined by doctors of sexaul abuse and indeed the doctors said they were sexaully abused.. but the judge didn’t take the Doctors evidence nor did she take any of the relevant evidence.. the children made retraction due to police pressure too.

        In the end of course the judge didn’t find the satanic cult allegations were too.

        Today we know satanic cult do exist and sexaul abuse does too.

        This case troubled me and i didn’t get any sleep for w few nights.

        Like

  43. What are facts? Since these hearings are facts findings but most of the time there’s no evidence but ppl words.. words aren’t evidence,

    Like

    • Facts are supposed to be evidence in the form of paper documents which can be verified or eyewitness testimony such as someone has physically seen the act taking place. The difference between the criminal and civil standard is simply based on procedures appropriate weight of 51% in the side of the party the judge rules against. Although in real life, this never happens. The real issue that occurs is boxes filled with money get passed around to shift the 51% in their favour. Although the higher the monetary value the judge receives, the greater the percentage shift occurs.

      Like

      • So, EVIDENCE can count as witness testimony even if the witness is “lying” or a police interview in which a person is “lying” to police as well. Therefore this isn’t sufficient evidence at all. Since the witnesses such as “social workers” and “foster careers” won’t ever give Truthful evidence there always trained to be ready to be questioned by lawyers.

        I know facts in criminal trials are more “REAL” Since CPS won’t bring the case forward unless they can be successful, but the LA will always bring a case which will never succeed since they know how the game works and the evidence isn’t really used greatly in these proceedings?

        Like

  44. I think that the standard of proof in Civil cases needs to be changed.
    Its 51/49
    Whereas in criminal court its 99/1

    Fix this corrupt system.

    Like

  45. I had judge oliver in my hearing and he said his microphone was not working so we should all move it to the side so it doesn’t get in the way. This is when judge oliver asked me whether i have anything for him. i never knew what he was talking about but my ex wifes barrister gave him a padded envelope. judge oliver takes the padded envelope and leaves it behind him on the windowsill in room 3 of reading county court and then casually took the envelope away when he was leaving. He didn’t even listen to my case and was constantly interrupting me and asking me to change questions. I completely lost confidence in him during the hearing and he took my children away from me and gave it to my wife who has a history of drug problems. This crooked judge sold my children out to a drug addict when i was a father of complete good character. I complained to the JCIO and they said it was not their job to investigate judges and sent me around in circles until i got no where. Now judge oliver is doing the same to others. I reported it to reading police station and they laughed at me and said that judges don’t take bribes and that i should go away as they have criminals to catch. If judge oliver is not a criminal, then who is!!

    Like

  46. I have looked on this site and read everybody comments, this judge Simon Oliver, if these comments are accurate he’s a very evil person and a bad judge and if he is still making welfare decisions for children i feel this man needs to be stopped before a grave injustice is done.

    BILLY DUNN

    Like

      • Why isn’t there anything being done to put a stop to this corruption? I don’t understand how people can allow such a judge like SIMON OLIVER to take their case, even the lawyers too, i’d be really, really worried for my life if he ever was a judge taking my case on. – I also want to say, there’s HUGE differences in Criminal and Civil, the Fact in civil cases YOU can literally be INNOCENT, but based on ‘PROBABILITIES, 51/49 you will most probably be found responsible, and then again, in Criminal there’s a Jury who will most of the time LISTEN and UNDERSTAND and in the END come to the RIGHT conclusion. i find that in CIVIL cases, there are Sexual Abuse cases being heard and i fear having the 51/49 standard of proof is NOT RIGHT. In the end the judges will always agree with the experts on the Local Authority side.

        Like

    • to everyone
      you may love to come and sit in as a friend
      hearing tomorrow 4th of April ,..10 am 4th floor Judge HHJ Oliver in Reading court ,
      come early for details ,on case ..

      Like

      • Just to update , yes the Judge is playing the devil advocate , case is now on the 4th of may , same time
        no appeal can be done he changed the case number according to the hearing 2 weeks ago he had no court order to act on the joker….lol of course he changed the case number ,how convenience so he can still control
        cause if appeal it would be with an different Judge , and it may come to light the corruption of his little clan

        honest this is better then Emerdale or Coronation Street my relative asked for a simple discharge without hearing which is a straight forward when child attained under false accusation as proof is in place
        but the Judge made a hearing between Mother and cafcass only Cafcass not even turning up but put in writing to go against order , thought there never accessed mother ,
        anyhow ,instead the 3 witches from West Berkshire social services turned up ,

        their are absolutely devious as their come , an old haggard white hair witch called June Rodgers ,accordingly a Barrister only this one is a mental case on its own .she shouted that she makes sure no child is returned , ,god knows of which Nursing home or mental institute she was pulled out to perform this act .. honest she looks about 72 years old , old little stumpy one she has no respect to anyone

        as she literacy shouted at my relative very aggressive what you want what what is it what you want wow
        when I saw that I was shocked I thought she is going to beat her up as she then slam the door behind my relative soonest she entered the conference room ,call it interrogation to imbalance mother in court

        yes I witness such bad behaviour of the authority to aggravation before even enter the court room so if you like to support us by all means come along ,top floor Reading Family Court , but keep distant so you can see 1st class manipulation of the Judge Oliver dodgy clan … how to play …

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s